Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. O'Brien said the WEC had established working agreements and those were posted on its website. She <br />said that the subcommittees had members who were not part of the larger collaborative because they were <br />just interested in a specific issue. She pointed out that all of the WEC and subcommittee meetings were <br />open to the public and there was enough public scrutiny to ensure that if any issue was presented to the <br />collaborative, it would be addressed. She explained the WEC included so many government partners <br />because of the in-kind donations of technical expertise and support they provided. <br /> <br />Mr. Zako asked if Ms. Bettman was aware of a particular person in the community who could represent <br />access management. He felt that several committee members, including himself, did advocate for access <br />management. He said that freight interests were represented, but rail was not a major topic at this time; a <br />rail representative could be invited to participate if rail became more relevant to the process. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark asked for more information about the shared goals of the WEC and what it hoped to accomplish. <br />He had heard discussion of both improving the flow of traffic and minimizing vehicle trips and needed to <br />better understand the collaborative's objectives. He imagined that at some point in the process it would be <br />desirable to have more involvement from the State and perhaps include State representatives and senators. <br />He also saw the potential for rail to change the dynamics dramatically in West Eugene. <br /> <br />Ms. O'Brien said the idea of the WEC was to improve transportation and access in West Eugene while <br />taking into account the implications of those improvements for land use and the environment and thus avoid <br />the type of problems that resulted in elimination of the West Eugene Parkway. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark observed that 1,200 new houses were being built in Veneta and if each house had one or two cars, <br />he questioned how that would be accommodated while trying to minimize trips. He hoped that the process <br />would result in solutions that were practical and widely supported. <br /> <br />Mr. Zako read the WEC purpose statement. He recognized that problems in West Eugene were very <br />difficult and it would be disingenuous to suggest the collaborative would come up with a solution to all of <br />them. He said the advantage of the WEC was that people were not fighting each other; they were all on the <br />same side of the table to try to solve the problems. He expected that the process would result in a package <br />of solutions that was more comprehensive than any one agency or jurisdiction could produce. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor emphasized that the collaborative was trying to remove the adversarial aspect from the transpor- <br />tation and land use planning processes. He agreed that the work plan and specific products were not clearly <br />defined at this point and information the council required in order to consider the funding request could be <br />provided. He stressed the importance of having a plan and system in place in to achieve the WEC goals. He <br />described the collaborative's transition from a self-selected, grassroots initiative to an official organization; <br />at that time membership was discussed and the group decided that members should reflect a broad range of <br />interests and be appointed by the bodies they represented. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon commended WEC for its willingness to undertake the mission. She appreciated being apprised <br />of the collaborative’s activities by email. She indicated she was willing to allocate $40,000 to the effort, but <br />was somewhat nervous about formalizing an agreement between the WEC and the City of Eugene for fear of <br />jeopardizing the collaborative effort. She urged that any agreement be broadly written and not prescriptive <br />in terms of defining the process and outcomes. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman stated that the WEC was requesting $40,000 and a “mantle of authorization” from the council <br />and that concerned her as there was no work program or information on expectations, objectives, products, <br />or what was being authorized. She did not feel that all interests had been involved in the WEC as rail was <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 4, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />