My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/04/07 Workshop
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2007
>
CC Minutes - 10/04/07 Workshop
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:45 AM
Creation date
11/28/2007 2:27:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/4/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Bettman said her reference was to managing access to the transportation corridors in order to decrease <br />congestion. She did not feel that everyone who needed to be was part of the WEC. She wanted to see <br />people added to the membership list, a work plan and a written memorandum or agreement between the City <br />and the WEC that specified what the City would receive for its investment of $40,000. <br /> <br />Ms. Proudfoot stated that part of the West Eugene corridor study was looking at access management tools to <br />improve safety and mobility along the corridor. She was not certain there was an independent community <br />advocate for access management, but it was definitely part of the WEC scope of work. <br /> <br />Ms. O'Brien said the WEC had established working agreement and those were posted on its website. She <br />said that the subcommittees had members who were not part of the larger collaborative because they were <br />just interested in a specific issue. She pointed out that all of the WEC and subcommittee meetings were <br />open to the public and there was enough public scrutiny that if any issue was presented to the collaborative, <br />it would be addressed. She explained the WEC included so many government partners because of the in- <br />kind donations of technical expertise and support they provided. <br /> <br />Mr. Zako asked if Ms. Bettman was aware of a particular person in the community who could represent <br />access management. He felt that several committee members, including himself, did advocate for access <br />management. He said that freight interests were represented, but rail was not a major topic at this time; a <br />rail representative could be invited to participate if rail became more relevant to the process. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark asked for more information about the shared goals of the WEC and what it hoped to accomplish. <br />He had heard discussion of both improving the flow of traffic and minimizing vehicle trips and needed to <br />better understand the collaborative's objectives. He imagined that at some point in the process it would be <br />desirable to have more involvement from the State and perhaps include state representatives and senators. <br />He also saw the potential for rail to change the dynamics dramatically in West Eugene. <br /> <br />Ms. O'Brien said the idea of the WEC was to improve transportation and access in West Eugene while <br />taking into account the implications of that for land use and the environment and thus avoid the type of <br />problems that resulted in elimination of the West Eugene Parkway. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 4, 2007 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.