CC Minutes - 10/04/07 Workshop - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. O’Brien said that one of the major factors in selecting a facilitator was demonstrated ability to help groups reach consensus. She contacted groups who had worked with those facilitators and feedback on the Osprey Group, which was selected, was unanimously positive. She said in each case the group had reached consensus without feeling “bullied” or “railroaded” in the process. She said there was strong support for a consensus model and that would be tested at the WEC’s October 24-25 meeting. She urged Ms. Bettman to bring her suggestion for a rail representative to the collaborative at that meeting. Regarding recommendations from the WEC, Ms. Bettman stated if there was not consensus, then it was just the same weighted majority rule process and was not acceptable to her. She reiterated her request for more information about the implications of providing funding to the WEC. She asked if the City was giving a mantle of authority to the group, if the council would see recommendations that were only forwarded by consensus and if a rail advocate would be added to the collaborative. Regarding a mantle of authority, Mr. Zako declared the WEC was under no illusion that it was a decision- making body; members understood they would only be making recommendations and it was up to the council to decide what to do with those recommendations. He said members recognized that recommenda- tions with less that unanimous support would not have much weight and for that reason were completely committed to making consensus recommendations. Ms. Taylor asked for an explanation of consensus. Ms. O’Brien explained the WEC had discussed a consensus model where all members accepted and bought into a decision and if it was not their first choice, they could live with it. She said members were being trained to not come to the table with specific demands from their own perspective or interests, but rather to present solutions that could work for everyone. Ms. Taylor said she was familiar with that approach and it often meant that less forceful people agreed to something they did not like. She was concerned that the collaborative assumed that EmX was the solution and had dismissed rail. Ms. O’Brien replied that nothing had been accepted and nothing had been eliminated. She liked the idea of including a representative of rail. Ms. Taylor remarked that the council was not involved in the process. Ms. O’Brien pointed out that Mr. Pryor was a member of the collaborative and all WEC members were charged with the responsibility to keep their organizations and constituencies involved and informed. MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 4, 2007 Page 7 Work Session