My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 12/10/07 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:28:25 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 11:42:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Schoening stated that the concept that was on the table included 15 speed tables, three traffic circles, <br />eight medians, and a choker on a section of Crest Drive that was west of Morse Ranch. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark asked if staff had consulted with the Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Department. <br />Mr. Schoening affirmed that staff had done so. He related that the difference between 18 feet and 20 feet <br />would be in the traffic circle for a school bus or emergency vehicle. He stated that staff ran the turning <br />templates for the large vehicles in the design software. <br /> <br />In response to a follow-up question from Mr. Clark, Mr. Schoening said pedestrians would not have a clear <br />idea of what bicyclists would do. <br /> <br />Mr. Lorish averred that this was assuming that the sidewalks were attached to the streets, but most of them <br />were not attached. He said “optical width” was an important element. He asserted that research showed <br />that narrow streets slowed down traffic and this would provide more safety. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark asked if the choke points would have to be taken out of the design if the street was narrower. Mr. <br />Schoening responded that with the council’s funding staff had contracted with professional land surveyors to <br />review over 15,000 data points. He said staff knew what the road width was, where the trees were, and <br />where the streams were. All of the trees greater than 12 inches in diameter had been inventoried for health, <br />species, height, and width by an arborist. He stressed that transportation staff had worked with the <br />engineering staff and design teams to design the concepts presented to the council. He reiterated that <br />impacts between 18 feet and 20 feet were essentially the same with regard to trees, properties, and the public <br />right-of-way. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor asked if the infrastructure would be basically the same with an 18 foot road as with a 20 foot <br />road. Mr. Schoening affirmed that it would. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor surmised that the issues were whether a narrower street would serve to slow traffic and that the <br />residents wished to preserve the “country feel” of the road. Regarding the latter, he felt that part of the <br />debate was whether Crest Drive was a country road or a city street. He asked what would happen if a <br />school bus and a garbage truck met on an 18-foot street. Mr. Schoening replied that one of the two would <br />have to go off the road for the other to get by. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor asked if one of the large vehicles having to go off the road onto a bioswale would create a hazard. <br />Mr. Schoening replied that it would as the bioswales would be on a 3:1 slope. In response to a follow-up <br />question from Mr. Pryor, Mr. Schoening affirmed that a 20-foot street would make a difference in this <br />situation. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka observed that with the current plan the bicyclists would either ride on the street or they would <br />ride on the sidewalk and he felt that both of these options would create problems. He said whether the street <br />was 18 feet wide or 20 feet wide would not affect bicyclists. Mr. Schoening confirmed this. Mr. Zelenka <br />averred that all streets should accommodate bicyclists as this would be the mode of transportation citizens <br />would be pushed into as the City grew and traffic issues increased. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka asked what difference a sloped curb would make as opposed to a regular curb. Mr. Schoening <br />replied that a regular curb would keep the bicycles in the street and a driver and pedestrians would know the <br />bicycle would stay in the street; everyone would have the same expectation. <br /> <br />Mr. Lorish said the design was already agreed upon. He averred that the neighborhood was already taking <br />into account the needs of bicyclists because they were working to slow the traffic. He believed that the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 8, 2007 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.