My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/15/07 Public Hearing
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2007
>
CC Minutes - 10/15/07 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:59 AM
Creation date
1/18/2008 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/15/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />3. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Providing for an Intergovernmental Agreement to <br />Establish a Regional Fiber Consortium for the Ownership and Operation of a Fiber Optic Sys- <br />tem; and Repealing Ordinance No. 20181 <br /> <br />Pam Berrian, Telecom/Cable Program Manager, introduced Milo Mecham with the Lane Council of <br />Governments, who was available to answer questions. She reviewed the proposed ordinance, which would <br />merge two western Oregon public fiber consortia that had been working together for several years. She <br />explained the Fiber South Consortium, composed of Oregon city and county governments, owned an intra- <br />Oregon fiber optic backbone. She said the Regional Fiber Consortium existed nearby and both organiza- <br />tions were established eight years ago when two fiber backbone providers gave several miles of dark fiber to <br />cities and counties in exchange for a 20-year waiver of rights-of-way use fees; in Eugene's case that <br />represented 66 feet of rights-of-way. She said merging the local government consortia under one organiza- <br />tional government body was permitted under State law ORS 190. <br /> <br />Ms. Berrian said the fiber was lit by a private provider chosen by a competitive process and the intention of <br />the urban/rural partnership was to deliver high speed broadband and voice services to nearby, but less urban <br />areas that did not have affordable access to such services. She emphasized that the merger would not create <br />new obligations for the City and the City's actions would remain voluntary; any financial obligation would <br />apply to Eugene only if Eugene agreed to the obligation beforehand. She said the partnership would serve <br />the public interest and reflect the reality of the administration of both networks. She said nothing in the <br />agreement reduced or adversely impacted Eugene's financial or program authority. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy opened the public hearing and called for testimony. <br /> <br />Drix <br />, Eugene, said his background was in communication and reviewed the changes in growth in the field <br />over the past several decades. He said the Internet represented a vast river of knowledge and wonder that <br />represented freedom and was accessible to a majority of the population, but it was important that everyone <br />be connected. He said fiber optics was the future and urged the council to support the ordinance. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman noted that the consortium membership was geographically determined, which meant Eugene <br />was not represented based on its population. She was concerned that the decision-making process of <br />regional bodies gave smaller cities the same voting power as Eugene. She said the proposed agreement <br />indicated financial resources would be the responsibility of the governing body and Eugene would be <br />participating in a process where it was not proportionately represented. She felt Eugene was often <br />considered the "deep pockets" in those situations and she was reluctant to be involved in a regional decision- <br />making body with budgeting authority without the weight of the City's population behind it. She asked how <br />the agreement would assure that Eugene taxpayers did not bear a disportionate burden. Ms. Berrian said the <br />agreement insured that no financial obligation would be undertaken without the council's specific authoriza- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if any consortium financial obligation would come before the council. Ms. Berrian said <br />any obligation that affected Eugene would come to the council. She reviewed the relevant provisions of the <br />bylaws. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 15, 2007 Page 7 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.