Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Elementary School site locate the crosswalk to the east of the future Green Lane <br />access to the former Santa Clara Elementary School site. <br /> <br />8. Pursuant to Recommendations 5 and 6, pedestrian amenities shall be included within the <br />commercial component of the mixed-use development. Amenities shall include two or more <br />of the design elements from Reconmlendation No.7. <br /> <br />Regarding the proposed text amendments, proposed Recommendation No.5 specifies that sites <br />"along Green Lane and adjacent to the fonner Santa Clara Elementary School site may be <br />designated and zoned Medium Density Residential", thereby alleviating any conflict with <br />Recommendations 3 and 4 and the proposed re-designation of the 1.3 acres site to Commercial. <br />Proposed Recommendation No.5 and No.6 both specify that if either the 1.3 or the 7.3 portions of <br />the site are re-designated as proposed, they shall be developed together as a PUD with an emphasis <br />on mixed-use principles. Proposed Reconmlendations 6, 7, and 8 also include specific design and <br />use requirements, a pedestrian friendly connection between the two sites across Green Lane, and <br />pedestrian amenities within the development site. <br /> <br />As previously discussed, staff finds the proposed re-designation, specifically the re-designation of <br />7.3 acres to Commercial, is inconsistent with the RRSC. However, if the Planning Commission <br />finds that the proposed re-designations are consistent and approve the proposal, to provide more <br />clarity staff recommends that the proposed text amendments should be revised as follows. To ensure <br />implementation of these elements as mandatory policies, the Planning Commission may also want <br />to require these text amendments as subarea policies rather than recommendations: <br /> <br />. Regarding proposed Recommendation No.5: <br /> <br />To clarify that abutting properties not included in this application are not subject to this <br />amendment, revise the first sentence to state: "Notlnvithstanding Recommendation No.4, <br />development sites abutting the south side of Green Lane and generally ti'est of the eastern <br />boundary of the former Santa Clara Elementary School Site..." <br /> <br />. Regarding proposed Recommendation No.6: <br /> <br />To clarify which zoning is approved, revise the second sentence to state: "If zoned commercial, <br />if shall be zoned C-2 and it shall be developed..." <br /> <br />Regarding 6.b, the subject site abuts R-I zoning to the northeast and R-2 zoning to the <br />southeast. EC 9.2'171 (2) already requires C-2 development to be limited to 30 feet in height <br />within 50 feet of R- I zoning, and to be limited to 35 feet in height within 50 feet of R-2 zoning. <br />Proposed 6.b only proposes a height restriction where abutting R-l zoning, and furthermore the <br />proposed height limitation of 35 feet is actually 5 feet taller than the code already restricts. <br />Therefore, this height limitation should be stricken. <br /> <br />To ensure proper implementation, 6.d. should be clarified to specify the quality and quantity of <br />architectural features and historic buildings (such as on each building, as a predominate theme <br />throughout the site, etcetera) as determined by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Staff Findings - October 8. 2007 <br />Page 25 <br />