Item 1: Ordinance on Oregon West Management

Home Browse Search

. Regarding proposed Recommendation No.7: The connection shown on the applicant's Site Concept plan (see applicant's Exhibit 1.2) depicts a Green Lane crossing between the northern 7.3 acre portion of the site and the southern 1.3 acre portion of the site. This is not "midblock" as referred to in proposed Recommendation 7. Therefore, the first sentence should be revised to state: "a pedestrian friendly connection... shall be provided at to cross Green Lane between the former Santa Clara School S'ite and a properly south olGreen Lane and shall include..." Staff also notes that the proposed text amendments direct the subject properties to be development with an emphasis on mixed-use principles. It is assumed that the specific requirements for enhanced pedestrian connections and uniting the site as one horizontal "mixed use center" is all that is meant by this statement. If further principles are required, they should be inserted into the text amendment. Regarding the fonner Santa Clara School site, none of the existing Recommendations I through 4 directly apply to the 7.3 acre site north of Green Lane. However, it is noted that the description of the subarea states, in part, that "the area contains the largest amount of community commercial use in Santa Clara." Again, as previously discussed under the commercial land policies, the RRSC does not appear to support re-designation of this 7.3 acre portion of the site to Commercial and C-2 Community Commercial zoning. Summary In summary, the findings in conjunction with the policies of the RRSC as discussed above, provide that the direction of the RRSC plan was to limit the amount of additional community commercial in Santa Clara (except where specifically identified), to limit the amount of new commercial on River Road, and to disperse commercial uses (especially neighborhood commercial) throughout River Road-Santa Clara. This direction, in conjunction with the Residential Land Policies above encouraging diverse housing and multi-family housing near existing commercial and transit facilities, provide the reasons staff does not find the amendments consistent with the RRSC as proposed. Staff encouraged the applicant to provide more mixing of uses throughout the site (such as more residential on the northern portion of the site), in order to obtain higher densities, to provide a better transition between new commercial uses and off-site residents, and to temper the amount of commercial dominance of the development. As previously stated, the applicant has revised their application several times in response to City and neighborhood comments. In comparison to the original application, the applicant's current proposal does provide more of a mixed use type development by including a residential component and providing the pedestrian amenities to unite the two portions of the site together. The proposal also includes specific measures to reduce potential C-2 impacts such as the fPD and fSR overlays, building height and size restrictions, and a reduced use list (such as no theatres, lodging, medical). However, for the reasons stated in response to the RRSC residential and commercial land use policies, staff does not find the proposed amendments, in their current form, consistent with the remaining applicable portions of the refinement plan. As previously mentioned, the Santa Clara Community Organization testimony included several suggestions which they believe would bring the project closer to the needs of the Santa Clara Staff Findings ~ October 8, 2007 Page 26