Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To clarify which zoning is approved, revise the second sentence to state: "If zoned <br />commercial, it shall be zoned C-2 and it shall be developed. . ." <br /> <br />Regarding 6.b, the subject site abuts R-l zoning to the northeast and R-2 zoning to the <br />southeast. EC 9.2171 (2) already requires C-2 development to be limited to 30 feet in height <br />within 50 feet of R-t zoning, and to be limited to 35 feet in height within 50 feet of R-2 <br />zoning. Proposed 6. b only proposes a height restriction where abutting R-I zoning, and <br />furthennore the proposed height limitation of 3 5 feet is actually 5 feet taller than the code <br />already restricts. Therefore, this height limitation should be stricken. <br /> <br />To ensure proper implementation, 6.d. should be clarified to specify the quality and quantity <br />of architectural featmes and historic buildings (such as on each building, as a predominate <br />theme throughout the site, etcetera) as determined by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />. Regarding proposed Recommendation No.7: <br /> <br />The connection shown on the applicant's Site Concept plan (see applicant's Exhibit 1.2) <br />depicts a Green Lane crossing between the northern 7.3 acre portion of the site and the <br />southern 1.3 acre portion of the site. This is not "midblock" as re1-erred to in proposed <br />Recommendation 7. Therefore, the first sentence should be revised to state: "a pedestrian <br />friendly connection.. . shall be provided at to cross Green Lane between the former Santa <br />Clara School Site and a property south of Green Lane and shall include..." <br /> <br />Staff Findings - October 8,2007 <br />Page 3 I <br />