Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The applicant proposes to re-designate approximately 7.3 acres from Low Density Residential to <br />Commercial, and to re-designate 1.3 acres of Commercial to Medium Density Residential. The <br />applicant provides analysis of the RLS and indicates that the subject property was not individually <br />considered in the detailed supply and demand analysis; however the site is included within the <br />supply analysis. The applicant notes the RLS contains a detailed analysis of dwelling units and finds <br />that the Santa Clara Subarea has the highest percent of single-family dwellings (88%) and the <br />lowest percentage of multi-family unit" (less than 1 %) (RLS, page 27). With the proposed <br />amendment, the maximum number of units on the 1.3 acre site is 37.ln the Santa Clara Subarea, the <br />applicant finds that the proposed amendment will increase the medium density residential dwelling <br />unit supply by approximately 1.1 % and decrease the low density residential dvvelling unit supply by <br />approximately 1.7% (page 14 of the written statement). The applicant also incorporates the updated <br />residential supply analysis provided by the City at the time of the Goal 5 ordinance. The applicant's <br />findings indicate that there is still an excess of low density zoning and medium density zoning, even <br />with the proposed amendments, but the applicant asserts that the change in zoning acreage is so <br />small that no further analysis is necessary. Therefore, based on the findings above the amendments <br />are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 10. <br /> <br />Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services: To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient <br />arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as aframeworkfor urban and rural <br />development. <br /> <br />The area affected by the amendments is located inside the City limits. The existing level of public <br />facilities and service is adequate to serve the needs of existing and future development. However, <br />specific design details related to public improvements such as stonnwater remain to be resolved in <br />the context of any future development proposaL The provision of these amendments does not <br />significantly affect the planning or development of future public facilities or services. Therefore, <br />the amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 11. <br /> <br />Goal 12 - Transpoltation: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic <br />tramportation system. <br /> <br />Goal 12 is implemented through the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), as defined in Oregon <br />Administrative Rule OAR 660-012-0000, et seq. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area <br />Transportation Plan (TransPlan) provides the regional policy framework through which the TPR is <br />implemented at the local level. The TPR (OAR 660-012-0060) states that when land use changes, <br />including amendments to acknowledged comprehensive plans, significantly affect an existing or <br />planned transpOltation facility the local government shall put in place measures to assure that the <br />allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standards <br />(level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. <br /> <br />To address the TPR, the applicant submitted findings and a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), <br />dated August 28, 2007, which was prepared by the consulting firnl of Branch Engineering, Inc. <br />Subsequent to the August 28th submittal, the applicant revised the TIA several times, responding to <br />comments from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), the City and Lane County. The <br />T1A evaluates the cun-ent performance of impacted transportation facilities~ the performance of <br />these facilities in 2022 with the proposed amendments (re-designate 7.3 acres from Low Density <br /> <br />Findings-November 19,2007 <br />Page 6 .. <br />