Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the site. therefore. \\~n help the region achieve its goal of compact urban gro\vih. As such the <br />proposed amendments support this policy. <br /> <br />/IJetro Plan, Objective 8. Encourage development of suitable vacant, underdeveloped. and <br />redevelopable land where services are available, thus capitalizing on public expenditures <br />already made for these services. <br /> <br />Response: <br />The subject property is currently underdeveloped with access to readily available public facilities <br />and services. Approval of this proposal will capitalize on the public services and expenditures <br />already made and planned for in the immediate area. [n short, the underdeveloped subject <br />property is suitable for commercial and residential uses and has access to public facilities and <br />services. As such the proposed amendments support this policy. <br /> <br />Metro Plan Specific Elements <br /> <br />A. Residential Land U~'e and Housing Element <br /> <br />Response: <br />Table 5 shows that the amendment '.vilI remove 7.3 acres of land from Low Density Residential <br />supply and add it to the supply of Conullercial land and remove 1.3 acres of land from the <br />Commercial land supply and add it to the supply of Medium Density Residential land. A net loss <br />of 6.0 acres of residential land occurs, however, the supply of higher density land increases. In <br />addition, the refinement plan amendment will remove 1.3 acres of land from commercial <br />designation and add 1.3 acres to the Medium Density Residential designation. The proposed <br />zone change will remove 1.3 acres of land from Low Density Residential (R-I) and add it to <br />Medium Density Residential (R-2) supply. The proposed amendments will provide needed <br />Medium Density Residential land in close proximity to commercial services and does not hinder <br />the ability to provide for the housing needs of the community which has an adequate supply of <br />low density residential land as detailed herein within the discussion of Goal 10. <br /> <br />Table 5: Amendment Changes in Acres <br /> <br /> <br />GE to C <br />C toM <br />No change <br />Total <br /> <br />7.3 <br />1.3 <br />0,1 <br />8,7 <br /> <br />7.3 <br />1,3 <br />0.6 <br />9.2 <br /> <br />Key: <br /> <br />Metro Plan: LDR~Low Density Residential, MDR- <br />Medium Density Residential, COM~Comrnercial; <br /> <br />RRfSC RP: M-Medium Density Residential. C- <br />Commercial. GE~Govemment & Education; <br /> <br />Zoning: R~l-Low Density Residential, R~2-Medium <br />Density Residential, C~l~Neighborhood Commercial, C~2- <br />Community Commercial,PL-Public Land <br /> <br />LOR to COM <br />COM to MDR <br />No Change <br />Total <br /> <br />PL To C~2 <br />C-1 to C-2 <br />R-1 to R-2 <br />No change <br />Total <br /> <br />5.2 <br />2.1 <br />1.3 <br />o <br />8,7 <br /> <br />5.2 <br />2.2 <br />1.3 <br />0.4 <br />9.2 <br /> <br />Source: LCOG data. analysis by Satre Associates, PC <br /> <br />Santa Clara - Metro Plan Amendment Application <br />Written Statement - August 2, 2007 <br /> <br />Page 22 of 32 <br />