Laserfiche WebLink
<br />projected to operate below the performance standard in the plan year regardless of the proposal <br />under review. Therefore, no facilities are significantly affected under this definition. <br /> <br />With regard to OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C), the analysis determined that two facilities within <br />the scope of the study are otherwise projected to operate below the perforn1ance standard in the <br />plan year. These facilities are: <br /> <br />. River Road at Green Lane intersection <br />· River Road at Hunsaker Lane and Irving Road intersection. <br /> <br />The commenting agencies determined that the proposal's contribution to the projected "F" Level <br />of Service at the River Road at Green Lane intersection is negligible, not worsening the <br />performance. Therefore under this definition, the proposal does not significantly affect that <br />facility. By a small margin, the proposal worsens the performance of the River Road at Hunsaker <br />Lane and Irving Road intersection in the plan year. Therefore, it significantly aflects that facility <br />under this definition. <br /> <br />OAR 660-012-0060(3) permits local governments to approve a PAPA that significantly affects a <br />facility \vithout requiring that mitigations bring the facility up to the applicable performance <br />standards. TIus is allowed only where the filCility is currently operating below the perfonnance <br />standard and, despite any planned facilities as defined in Section (4) of the TPR,it is also <br />projected to operate below the performance standard in the plan year. Taking into account all <br />planned facilities, the TIA demonstrates that these conditions are met at the River Road at <br />Hunsaker Lane and Irving Road intersection. OAR 660-012-0060(3)(c) requires transportation <br />improvements that mitigate the net impact and avoid further degradation in the development <br />(opening) year. The TIA used 2008 as the development year in this analysis. The impact analysis <br />shows that even without mitigation there is no measurable development year degradation of the <br />facility. Therefore, no mitigation is needed to meet the requirements of OAR 660-012- <br />0060(3)( c). <br /> <br />Proposed Improvements: <br />The TIA has shown that the Proposed PAPA significantly affects only one facility in the plan <br />year and that the effect in the development year is so minute, the requirements of the TPR can be <br />met without mitigation. Nonetheless, the applicant and commenting agencies have informally <br />agreed that certain improvements to the existing facilities are desired. Because these <br />improvements will be specified in conditions of approval for the proposed PAPA, the proposal <br />must be reevaluated as conditioned~ The plalU1ed improvements are offered ao:; "minor <br />transportation improvements" as defined OAR 660-0121-0005(15) and pursuant to OAR 660- <br />012-0060(2)(e). These improvements are: <br /> <br />. Construct an additional Hunsaker Lane westbound approach lane <br />· Construct an additional Green Lane westbound approach lane. <br /> <br />With the proposed improvements specified as conditions of development, the IIA has <br />determined that, measured at the end of the planning period, the proposed an1endment will <br />neither reduce the performance of existing or planned transportation facilities below the <br />miIumum acceptable performance standards identified in TransPlan. nor worsen the <br /> <br />Santa Clara-- Zone Change Application <br />Written Statement - August 2, 2007 <br /> <br />Page 39 of 41 <br />