Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(6.8,22) as a refinement of the Metro Plan, and therefore would make the Metro Plan internally <br />inconsistent. <br /> <br />Regarding the Recommendation: <br />Revise the recommendation to omit the reference to non~compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals <br />on page 30 of the staff recommendation (page 33 of the agenda packet). The following shows the revised <br />language with the omission struck out: <br /> <br />Recommendation: Based on the available information and materials in the record, and the above <br />preliminary findings, stafffinds that the proposal does not comply with the applicable approval <br />criteria, specifically with regard to Statewide Planning Goals, the Metro Plan; and the River <br />Road-Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan. lfno further evidence is provided to the Planning <br />Commission that demonstrates consistency with these criteria, the Planning Commission should <br />recommend denial of the applicant's proposal to City Council <br />