My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: Railroad Quiet Zone
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 02/25/08 Work Session
>
Item C: Railroad Quiet Zone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:24:41 AM
Creation date
2/22/2008 9:39:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/25/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />constructing median barriers, converting two-way streets to one-way traffic, and leaving some crossings <br />unchanged. Each potential strategy at each specific at-grade crossing was evaluated based on a number <br />of criteria, including ability to reduce risk based on a “risk index” used by the FRA, costs (initial capital <br />costs and on-going maintenance costs), engineering feasibility, public acceptance, and conformance with <br />traffic safety standards and other policies related to the local transportation system. <br /> <br />Closing at-grade rail crossings is the safety measure most preferred by the FRA, ODOT Rail and the <br />Union Pacific Railroad, which owns and operates the rail lines that run through the downtown area. <br />Closing redundant or unsafe railroad crossings is a goal of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The <br />likelihood of obtaining non-City funding from these agencies increases with the number of at-grade <br />crossings that are closed. However, closing at-grade rail crossings is the safety measure least supported <br />by the public. The FRA process to obtain a quiet zone requires ODOT Rail, Union Pacific and the City <br />to all agree on the SSMs proposed. None of the parties can force a quiet zone or other changes to <br />railroad crossings without the consent of the others. <br /> <br />Based on analyses of the federal criteria necessary to obtain a quiet zone and a sense of public <br />acceptance, staff has developed a conceptual design that would likely result in a quiet zone. The <br />scenario displayed in Table 1 describes the different supplemental safety measures needed to reduce the <br />risk index from the current level of 17,689 to 11,029. Guidelines stipulate that implementation of a <br />quiet zone shall result in a reduction of the risk index for the segment under consideration. <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Crossing Location Treatment <br />Van Buren Median <br />Monroe None <br />Madison Close <br />Jefferson One-way <br />Washington One-way <br />Lawrence Median <br />Lincoln None <br />Pearl None <br />High Quad gates <br />8th and Hilyard Quad gates <br /> <br />Risk Index 11,029 <br />Estimated Cost $1,350,000 <br /> <br /> <br />This scenario assumes only one street closure and is likely to qualify for only $50,000 of ODOT Rail- <br />administered Section 130 funds. If the City decides to pursue more street closures to increase the <br />likelihood of non-City funding, staff considered five potential closures: Monroe, Madison, Jefferson, <br />Lawrence and Lincoln streets. Given the lack of public support for multiple street closures in this area, <br />staff did not fully analyze a scenario involving multiple closures, other than to determine that there <br />would be significant impacts to business access, neighborhood connectivity, bicycle and pedestrian <br />routes and emergency response. <br /> <br />In 2007 the FRA updated its risk index calculator to take into account a train-pedestrian crash at the <br />Eighth and Hilyard crossing. The risk index at that crossing increased almost five-fold, and the average <br /> F:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080225\S080225C.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.