Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Taylor related that she planned to present another resolution at the next meeting opposing the <br />WOPR with more specific language. She declared that logging was “destroying the future for human <br />beings.” She said the council should undertake anything it could do that might have some influence on the <br />BLM plan. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka agreed it was regretful that the council could not pass its resolution prior to the BLM <br />deadline for public comment. He felt the choice that pitted the environment against the economy was an <br />effort to divide people locally. He thought it was very important to protect the forests. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy stated that she had sent a letter in opposition to the WOPR, as had Councilor Taylor, prior to <br />the deadline for public comment. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark concurred with Councilor Pryor. He did not like the choice the community was faced with. <br />He disagreed that the federal government had placed the County in this position. He thought it was a <br />combination of the courts and a number of other things. He resented that the council was being presented <br />with a resolution that said councilors were either in favor of the resolution or they were in favor of <br />clearcutting “vast swaths” of Lane County. He declared that the truth was a “much more nuanced position” <br />that required more discussion. <br /> <br />The motion to approve Resolution 4923, concerning protection of mature and old growth <br />forests in the State of Oregon, passed 5:3; councilors Clark, Solomon, and Poling voting in <br />opposition. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for discussion of Item D. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman congratulated the Finance staff for an “almost entirely clean” report. She asked for an <br />explanation of the over-expenditure listed on page 156 of the report. <br /> <br />Finn Cronin, Financial Reporting Manager for the Finance Division, explained that the first over- <br />expenditure was in the Urban Renewal Agency. He explained that the budget had been made two years <br />earlier and at that time staff had estimated that half of the staff time would be spent on the Riverfront <br />District and half would be spent on the Downtown District. He reported that last April the council had <br />ramped up the activity in the downtown area because of the Broadway Redevelopment proposal. He said <br />the supplemental budget in May had estimated the budget could be exceeded by a minimal amount. He <br />explained that rather than taking up staff and council time by bringing forward a small addendum to the <br />supplemental budget, they decided to “live with” the over-expenditure. He stated that as the costs came in <br />for the consultants to craft some of the options, related attorney fees, and staff time to support the newly <br />formed the West Broadway Advisory Committee (WBAC), they had amounted to a $72,000 increase for the <br />Fiscal Year (FY) 07 expenses. He underscored that a large portion of the increase had not been recognized <br />until the end of July, when FY07 expenditure reconciliation was complete. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman thought the council had voted to appropriate $200,000 when it had voted to implement <br />the WBAC. She asserted that the council had “generously funded” the activity. Community Development <br />Division Manager, Mike Sullivan, clarified that the motion that directed the formation of the WBAC <br />included no funding. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 14, 2008 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />