Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pic’s in 2007, traffic flow on Friendly has decreased to a trickle of what it formerly was – typically <br />a moderate volume during morning and evening rush hours on weekdays from local residents, <br />and other wise a few delivery vehicles and minimal car traffic during the remainder on weekdays <br />and on weekends. Since Flics and Pics will never come again, and no major expansion of the <br />urban growth boundary to the south is possible, this decreased traffic flow will become the norm <br />for the future. Thus the premise for classifying the streets as collectors as since been eliminated. <br /> <br />2 . When considering what construction measures are needed to repair the streets, a thorough <br />study of the existing roadbed should be undertaken. While I am no civil engineer, I can see that <br />despite over 30 years of total neglect in city maintenance since the streets were assumed from <br />the county, they are still in better condition, even with the existing potholes, that many city streets <br />which need to be completely repaired every 3-5 years – look at Chambers and 18th as examples. <br />It appears that the county roadbed is not only adequate but sturdier that that which exists on most <br />city streets. It would likely save a huge amount of money and simplify repairs if all that is needed <br />is a good resurfacing, rather than massive excavation to replace an already sound substructure. <br />To say nothing of the problems with water, sewer, gas and other utilities, disruption of the root <br />structures of roadside trees, and disturbance of the underlying soil which could result in <br />significant slippage given the clay layers and underground water seepage we experience already <br />outside the streets. <br /> <br />3. Finally, after consulting with my home owners insurance, I was informed that any changes in <br />the hillside stability in the neighborhood caused by excavation, removal of large trees, diversion <br />of runoff water, etc, which resulted in slides would not be covered by homeowner insurance, but <br />that the city would be liable. City liability would only be given, however, if the City had been <br />served notice to this effect. I therefore herewith also use this forum to serve notice that should <br />any such slides occur, I will hold the city liable for damages to my property. <br /> <br />In closing, I wish to extend my deepest thanks to all those neighbors who dedicated their time <br />and effort to work with city staff to achieve the preliminary design being presented to City Council <br />on 19 February, and most sincerely hope that Council will reward those efforts by approving the <br />designs. <br /> <br />Sincerely <br /> <br />Stan Kluth <br />2830 Friendly St. <br />Eugene <br /> <br /> <br />From: Ted Selker [mailto:selker@media.mit.edu] <br />Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 7:58 PM <br />To: Eric Selker <br />Cc: Betty Taylor <br />Subject: Re: to Betty Taylor (et al) re Crest Dr. improvements <br /> <br /> <br />Not to intrude too much from my palo alto perspective but.... i am a shoulder enthusiast, <br />they make cars and bikes safer by giving everyone a way to get out of each others way <br />and creating a breakdown lane. <br /> <br />a compromise could be an extra wide "paved path" without a sharp curb, this is done <br />many places, instead of a curb, a trough that can be used as a gutter, a ramp to a <br />driveway and CLEARLY separates traffic might make everyones interests work, it allows <br />a bike to gracefully leave or enter the path without navigating or falling on a curb, it <br />allows people to leave the road here is approximently what they look like all over Palo <br />- 4 - <br />Crest Drive CSS Design Recommendation Public Testimony 2/14/08 through 4/8/08 <br />