Laserfiche WebLink
values and needs and all members had to compromise for the good of the whole. She was convinced that <br />slowing traffic would be an adequate accommodation for bicyclists. She urged the council to vote yes on the <br />proposed design. <br /> <br />Charles Quinn <br />, 375 Mary Lane, a bicycle commuter and vice chair of the Crest Drive Citizens Organiza- <br />tion, said he had been under the impression that by not supporting the previous approval of nine foot lanes <br />he would be allowing more space for bicycle lanes and sidewalks. Now it appeared sidewalks would be <br />narrowed and intended to accommodate both bicycles and pedestrians. He said it should be clear that an 80- <br />foot bus and two-foot bicycle could not fit into a nine foot lane, much less a two-foot sidewalk. He said that <br />context sensitive design was a way of accommodating for unique situations, and not intended to disregard all <br />logic and safety standards to save money. Mr. Quinn acknowledged that he funding system was not perfect <br />or fair, but it was what was in place. He maintained that bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be standard <br />widths and be consistently placed on the same side of the street. He asked if the safety of pedestrians, <br />cyclists, children, and pets, were worth less than the cost of installing an adequate and uniform street. There <br />was no safe way for his child to travel to Crest School via bicycle from his house. He asked the council to <br />keep safety in the forefront of its thinking. <br /> <br />Robert Hutchins <br />, 575 Fulvue Street, said the street plan was a “Trojan Horse” presented by a committee <br />made up of property owners who were designing a street to reduce their own costs. A miniscule percentage <br />of the people were affected by the changes on the road. He drove down Crest Drive every day and had <br />passed numerous bicyclists traveling the road on Saturday. Crest Drive was a major thoroughfare that <br />th <br />served more than the residents who lived on it. People living south of 30 Avenue and east of Willamette <br />Street used the street to reach the southwest portion of the county, and those living in the southwest portion <br />of the county also used Crest Drive. It needed to be small and slow because it was residential, but he could <br />not allow his small daughter to ride on Crest Drive because it was so scary. He thought at least one bicycle <br />lane should be included for all residents who used the road. <br /> <br />Teresa Dingman <br />, 575 Fulvue Street, thanked the design team and staff for all their work but expressed <br />concern the design could not provide for safe passage for bicycles and pedestrians. The current design <br />would jeopardize her ability to use alternative modes of transportation. She asked the council to reject any <br />proposal that did not encourage alternative transportation and which posed risk to those choosing to walk or <br />bicycle in the area. <br /> <br />th <br />Fred Lorish, <br /> 907 West 36 Avenue, said the design team had to take into account many factors, including <br />stormwater runoff. The team discussed all the topics and balanced them against five sets of values it had <br />created. The design team could not, and should not, take one value and raise it above the rest. Because of <br />the discussions that occurred and the research that had gone on, the result before the council was an <br />innovative, balanced design. He asked the council to approve it as submitted because he thought the design <br />team had done what the council asked it to do. <br /> <br />th <br />David Cole <br />, 841 West 36 Avenue, chair of the Crest Drive Citizens Association, shared a measure passed <br />by the association recommending the council approve the preliminary street design. <br /> <br />Laura Bailey <br />, 2932 Friendly Street, a member of the design team, said she would be assessed $20,000 for <br />the street improvement project. She noted the long process that preceded the design. She said the design <br />team realized it was impossible to please every user and resident, and everyone had to compromise during <br />the process. She felt the preliminary designs met the residents’ desire to retain the neighborhood’s character <br />and feel, and most importantly, to create safe streets for all users, which was a primary concern in the <br />process. She said all should realize the designs were preliminary and were only about 60 percent completed; <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 19, 2008 Page 9 <br /> Public Hearing <br />