Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. There being no requests to speak, Mayor Piercy closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling referred to 44115(2) and asked if minors would be able to take advantage of the City’s <br />diversion program. Ms. Hammitt indicated she believed that was the case, and would confirm it with Judge <br />Allen. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved that the City Council adopt <br />Council Bill 4969, an ordinance concerning offenses and State traffic laws. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling requested that the vote be postponed pending an answer to his question. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for a brief meeting break. <br /> <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING <br />Crest Drive Community Team Recommended Design for Crest Drive, Storey Boulevard, and <br />Friendly Street <br /> <br />Jenifer Willer of the Public Works Department was present to answer questions. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Julie Redner <br />, 2899 Friendly Street, expressed concern about the assessed cost of the road improvement <br />project being contemplated on her street. She had about 100 street of frontage and would be assessed the <br />maximum costs, about $20,000 or more. She did not think she used the street anymore or any less than <br />those on narrow or panhandled lots. She did not qualify for a senior deferral or income subsidy but was a <br />single head of household working for a small nonprofit, and the amount involved was huge to her. She <br />asked the council to reduce the assessment, change the formula to be fairer, or explore alternative funding <br />strategies. <br /> <br />Paul Moore <br /> advocated the inclusion of safe and inviting bicycle paths in the street improvement project, <br />particularly uphill bicycle lanes, to attract riders. He said the lanes would not add costs to the property <br />owners or increase the costs of the project substantially, but the design committee would not investigate the <br />question. He said if cost were to become an issue, it would be reasonable to consider alternate funding <br />sources for the bicycle lanes, not to eliminate them. Speaking to concerns such lanes would take too much <br />space, he pointed out the City owned a 60-foot easement on each of the streets and it had not been proved <br />such lanes would not fit. Mr. Moore suggested that bicycle lanes could be narrowed where necessary <br />because of terrain. In regard to safety, he said that concerns had been expressed about speeds from wider <br />lanes but concerns about speed seem to be dismissed when considering bicyclists traveling on a 23-foot road <br />width. Mr. Moore said another argument was that no one used bicycle lanes in that area but that was not <br />the case. He acknowledged that many people did not ride but that was to be expected given the condition of <br />the streets and speeds at which cars travel. He asked the council to include uphill bicycle lanes on all roads <br />in the project area. <br /> <br />Kathy Saranpa <br />, Friendly Street, spoke of the work done by the Crest Drive Community Team and staff in <br />designing the project. She said the team, which worked very hard for a long time, had included bicyclists. <br />She suggested there were differences about what constituted bicycle safety, and she suggested that the <br />addition of such lanes gave a false sense of security to those using them. The team worked hard to weigh all <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 19, 2008 Page 8 <br /> Public Hearing <br />