Laserfiche WebLink
<br />measure of the availability and convenience of alternative modes and is expected to result <br />in an increase in the use of those modes. One of the key aspects of the bike system plan- <br />ning effort was to identify and address existing gaps and barriers in the existing system. <br />These gaps and barriers are addressed in the bicycle project list, and are identified as the <br />"Priority Bikeways," thus increasing the convenience and availability of the bike mode. <br />This measure provides a direct indication of the public policy effort in TransPlan toward <br />reducing reliance on the auto and increasing the availability of alternative modes. <br /> <br />Both the Percent Transit Mode Share on Congested Corridors and the Percent Non-Auto <br />Trips also are indicators of increased availability and convenience of alternative modes. <br />Achieving the 72 percent increase in transit mode share along the congested corridors is a <br />direct result of more frequent service. The proposed BR T system would provide 10- <br />minute service along its corridors. The 10-minute threshold is a critical one for transit <br />service because it is considered to be the level of service at which riders do not need <br />schedules. This increase in convenience is one of the main reasons for the 72 percent in- <br />crease in mode share on congested corridors. This is part of an overall increase in transit <br />mode share of 49 percent. <br /> <br />j,I..;o-t., <br /> <br />TPR Obiective C: Achieving the alternative standard is likely to result in a significant <br />increase in the share of trips made by alternative modes, including walking, bicycling, <br />ridesharing and transit. <br /> <br />Virtually all of the plan's six performance measures are relevant to this objective. As al- <br />ready described above, the 72 percent increase in Transit Mode Share on Congested Cor- <br />ridors and the 18 percent increase in Non-Auto Trips both show a significant increase in <br />the share of trips made by alternative modes as a result of implementation actions in the <br />plan. <br /> <br />Also already described above is the direct relationship between the Priority Bikeway <br />Miles measure and the likely result of additional.bike trips. <br /> <br />The three plan measures related to nodal development - Acres of Zoned Nodal Develop- <br />ment, Percent of Dwelling Units Built in Nodes and Percent of New "Total" Employment <br />in Nodes - are all indicators of plan implementation measures directly intended "to result <br />in a significant increase in the share of trips made by alternative modes". The Percent of <br />Dwelling Units Built in Nodes and Percent of New "Total" Employment in Nodes meas- <br />ures are both market response measures in that they reflect the development sector re- <br />sponse to the public policies proposed for nodal development. They reflect the benefits <br />coming from changes in development anticipated for nodal development. The very defi- . <br />nition of nodal development included in TransPlan states that: <br /> <br />Nodal development is a mixed-use pedestrian-friendly land use <br />pattern that seeks to increase concentrations of population and em- <br />ployment in well-defined areas with good transit service, a mix ofidiverse and compatible land uses, and public and private improve- <br />Exhibit C <br />Findings in Support of the Adoption of TransPlan <br /> <br />33 <br />