My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20234 Exhibit C
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2001 No. 20220-20243
>
Ordinance No. 20234 Exhibit C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:49:53 PM
Creation date
5/30/2008 3:20:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20234
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ments designed to be pedestrian and transit oriented. (emphasis <br />added) <br /> <br />., ". ,.~,. <40 <br /> <br />The TransPlan defmition of nodes and nodal development continues, stating in part that: <br /> <br />Fundamental characteristics of Nodal Development reauire: <br />· Design elements that support pedestrian environments and encourage <br />transit use, walking and bicycling; . <br />· A transit stop which is within walking distance (generally 1/4 mile) of <br />anywhere in the node; <br />· Mixed uses so that services are available within walking distance <br /> <br />These requirements are directly related to increasing the use of alternative modes. The <br />nodal development measures and their integration into the overall TransPlan strategy are <br />the basis for the increase in Percent Non-Auto Trips and the Percent Transit Mode Share <br />on Congested Corridors. Nodal development in IransPlan also plays a significant role in <br />allowing the region's VMT per capita to remain virtually unchanged over the planning <br />horizon. <br /> <br />TPR Obiective D: <br /> <br />VMT per capita is unlikely to increase by more than 5 percent. <br /> <br />VMT per capita in the Eugene-Springfield area is expected to remain virtually unchanged <br />through 2015 (0.3 percent increase). <br /> <br />TPR Obiective E: The alternative standard is measurable and reasonably related to <br />achieving the goal of reduced reliance on !he au~omobile as described in OAR 660-012- <br />0000. <br /> <br />The measurability of each of the performance measures weighed heavily in the MPC sub- <br />committee's selection process. The relationship of these measures to reduced reliance on <br />the automobile is referenced in our assessment of other objectives. The table below <br />summarizes the measurability of each of the proposed measures. While each measure <br />relies on different data, the region currently maintains all of the underlying information <br />required to track these measures. <br /> <br />Measure Update Process/Reliability <br /> The mode choice model relies on current data on the existing transportation <br /> system (traffic counts, transit ridership, roadway speeds, etc.) and travel be- <br />Percent Non-Auto Trips havior data (typically through travel surveys). Estimates are as reliable as the <br /> model being used: The model is most reliable when based on an updated <br /> travel survey and current system data. <br />Percent Transit Mode LID updates its ridership da41 frequently. Traffic volumes are updated regu- <br />Share on Congested Cor- larly. Very reliable.' . , <br />ridors <br />Priority Bikeway Miles This measure would be updated based on the sum of the distances of bikeway <br />projects determined to be "priority." Very reliable. <br /> <br />Exhibit C <br />Findings in Support of the Adoption of TransPlan <br /> <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.