My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20234 Exhibit C
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2001 No. 20220-20243
>
Ordinance No. 20234 Exhibit C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:49:53 PM
Creation date
5/30/2008 3:20:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20234
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(m) Replacement of docks and other facilities without significantly increasing <br />the capacity of those facilities; <br />(n) Expansions or alterations of public use airports that do not permit service <br />to a larger class of airplanes; and <br />(0) Transportation facilities, services and improvements other than those <br />listed in this rule that serve local travel needs. The travel capacity and level of serv- <br />ice of facilities and improvements serving local travel needs shall be limited to that <br />necessary to support rural land uses identified in the acknowledged comprehensive <br />plan or to provide adequate emergency access. <br /> <br />Certain projects set out in the revised TransPlan project list and described below extend <br />onto rural land, or constitute an expansion of a road that is coterminous with the UGB <br />and may encroach upon rural lands. While projects within the UGB that serve as the <br />boundary to the UGB may not need to be independently evaluated under this rule, all of <br />these projects comply with the provisions of this rule. Project 454, the expansion of <br />Greenhill Road, project 533, the improvements to a small portion of Irvington Drive, <br />project 625, the improvements to Coburg Road, projects 654 and 606, the portion dealing <br />with improvements to Game Farm Road between 1-5 and Crescent Avenue, project 98, <br />the improvements to Thurston Road, and project 66, the improvements to Jasper Road all <br />constitute transportation improvements allowed by ORS 215.213 and OAR 660-012- <br />.0065(3)(b). The functional classifications of these roads refer to the size, capacity and <br />design of the road, not to its location in an urban or rural setting. <br /> <br />Other roadway improvement projects extend beyond the UGB to some degree and are <br />permitted by OAR 660-0 12-0065(3)(b), (d) or (g). Project 66 (Jasper Road Extension) is <br />a new road within the Springfield UGB that requires a short realignment of Jasper Road <br />outside the UGB. Project 297 (Bloomberg Connector) is a realignment of a portion of <br />McVay Highway north of the 30th Avenue interchange. Project 485 (Greenhill Road, <br />Barger Drive to Airport Road) upgrades a substandard portion of Greenhill Road to meet <br />the requirements of OAR 660-012-0020(2)(b):-"Project 486 (Greenhill Road, north of air- <br />port boundary to Airport Road) is a realignment of another segment of Greenhill Road <br />necessitated by safety improvements to the Eugene Airport. Project 554 (Wilkes Drive) <br />improves a short segment of Wilkes Drive east of the UGB. Project 625 (Coburg Road) <br />upgrades the segment of Coburg Road leading to Armitage State Park from the south to <br />meet the requirements of OAR 660-012-0020(2)(b). Most of these projects are permitted <br />by OAR 660-012-0065(3)(b). Project 486, the realignment of Greenhill Road near the <br />Eugene Airport, project 297, the realignment of the McVay Highway, and project 66, the <br />realignment of a portion of Jasper Road to form a new intersection with Jasper Road Ex- <br />tension, meet the definition of "realignment" specified by OAR 660-012-0065(2)(f), and <br />are therefore allowed by OAR 660-0 12-0065(3)(d). <br /> <br />In each of these instances, the proposed work is not only permitted by the Transportation <br />Planning Rule; it is consistent with the intent of the rule to upgrade roads to agency stan- <br />dards. In addition, nearly all of the projects in table 1 a of chapter 3 have been previously <br /> <br />Exhibit C <br />Findings in Support of the Adoption of TransPlan <br /> <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.