My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: General Obligation Bonds for Street Maintenance
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 06/09/08 Work Session
>
Item C: General Obligation Bonds for Street Maintenance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:55 PM
Creation date
6/6/2008 9:34:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/9/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />pedestrian paths. In all cases, bond funds would be used only to preserve existing elements, not to <br />expand the capacity of the system, for instance, by installing new traffic lights or bike lanes. <br /> <br />An initial list of street preservation projects to be funded from the bond proceeds has been developed <br />based on data from the pavement management system. The pavement management system incorporates <br />street data including surface descriptions and associated mileage, pavement condition and current <br />treatment programs and costs. The system then uses that data to project future treatment needs. The <br />2008 Pavement Management Report generated from this system is included as Attachment B. <br />Attachment C sets out the initial list of projects generated by the pavement management system. This <br />list allocates all of the bond proceeds, except for the portion that would be used for the annual $350,000 <br />allocation for preserving off-street bike and pedestrian paths. <br /> <br />The next step in developing this list into a set of projects for the bond measure is to consolidate some of <br />the street segments identified as needing overlay or reconstruction during the next 10 years into logical <br />street preservation projects that would be done concurrently. For instance, the list contains several <br />segments of a street, such as Willamette, with some gaps in-between. The actual project undertaken <br />might include a contiguous length of Willamette, including those short portions not originally identified <br />by the pavement management system, depending on the condition rating of those other portions. In that <br />way, staff would ensure that a single street is not under construction each year to repair different small <br />segments, but the street is repaired in a more comprehensive way. When staff brings back the bond <br />resolution for council consideration in July, the project list will be refined to take this consolidation of <br />street preservation projects into account. <br /> <br />The council also expressed interest in ensuring that any list of street preservation projects to be <br />associated with the bond measure be geographically distributed throughout the community to make <br />certain that all areas of the City receive a benefit from the bond proceeds. In order to allow council and <br />the public to more easily see the geographic distribution of streets on the project list, a map of the initial <br />list of street preservation projects is included in Attachment D. Note that the map does not include the <br />off-street bike and pedestrian paths that will be overlaid or reconstructed with the $350,000 annual <br />allocation. <br /> <br />Project Implementation <br />Over the life of the bond measure, pavement conditions or circumstances could change, making it more <br />fiscally prudent or a higher community priority to spend funds on street preservation projects which <br />were not anticipated in 2008. For example, current street condition ratings, as determined by the City’s <br />pavement management system and additional testing, may change due to unanticipated severe weather <br />which might warrant priority overlays on streets not previously identified as “at risk” or not otherwise <br />due for an overlay for several years. In addition, future street repair costs cannot be predicted with <br />absolute accuracy, and adjustments to the project list might be needed to match the list of projects to the <br />amount of available bond proceeds. <br /> <br />To address the flexibility needed to conform the GO Bond project list to the amount of bond proceeds <br />available over the 10-year period, the resolution would include a provision for a Department Advisory <br />Committee named the Street Preservation Advisory Committee (Committee). The Committee would <br />advise the Public Works Department about the street preservation projects to be funded by each year’s <br />capital budget. It would be comprised of a variety of stakeholders from various geographic areas of the <br />City and would include members with expertise in street preservation activities. The Public Works <br />Department would take the recommendation of the Committee into account when compiling the annual <br /> Z:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080609\S080609C.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.