Laserfiche WebLink
<br />street preservation project list, and would note any differences between the Committee <br />recommendations and previous proposed project lists. The Committee would also advise the City <br />Manager about supplementing the project list if unanticipated pavement conditions or funding oppor- <br />tunities arise. The City Manager would consult with the Committee prior to modifying the initial street <br />preservation project list. <br /> <br />There would also be a regular review by an outside auditor for the purpose of issuing a report on the use <br />of the bond proceeds. The auditor procedures would ascertain that the bond proceeds were used for the <br />purposes, and in compliance with the restrictions, set forth in the ballot language. The auditor would <br />furnish a written report to the City Manager, who would provide the report to council as well as to the <br />Committee. The report would also be made publicly available. <br /> <br />Timing <br />Council’s last opportunity to pass a resolution placing the measure on the ballot prior to going on break <br />would be August 6. July 28 is the tentatively scheduled date for council consideration of this resolution, <br />which would require that Council provide final direction for changes to the resolution no later than June <br />30 in order to allow for adequate bond counsel review and approval of those changes. A draft of the <br />resolution is included as Attachment E. <br /> <br />Once council passes a resolution placing the measure on the ballot, the City Attorney will create a ballot <br />title (caption, question and summary), which will be published in the Register-Guard. Citizens will have <br />an opportunity to challenge the ballot language by filing a petition with the Lane County Circuit Court <br />within seven business days of the date that the City Attorney files the ballot title with the City Recorder. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Council’s goals for 2007 include “Transportation Initiative: Develop mechanisms to adequately fund our <br />transportation system for cars, trucks, bikes and pedestrians including maintenance and preservation and <br />capital reconstruction.” <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br />The three policy issues before council at this work session are: <br /> <br />? <br /> Project List: <br /> An initial street preservation project list to be included in the measure is provided <br />as Attachment C. This list will be refined to consolidate street segments needing repairs into <br />logical engineering projects, as previously described. The council could modify the project list <br />as deemed appropriate. <br />? <br /> Project Implementation: <br /> Staff recommends a Street Preservation Advisory Committee be <br />formed to advise the Public Works Department on the GO Bond project list to be funded in the <br />capital budget each year. The council could modify the method of building project flexibility <br />into implementation of the bond measure. <br />? <br /> Measure Size: <br /> The council conceptually approved $6.5 million of annual spending, adjusted in <br />subsequent years for inflation plus bond issuance costs, for a total measure of $81.1 million. The <br />council could choose a different amount for the bond measure. Attachment F includes the effect <br />on taxpayers for different bond amounts. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />