Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ATTACHMENT E <br />recommending .75. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless concurred that a more modest approach should be taken. <br /> <br />Mr. Carroll was comfortable with rounding to .65. <br /> <br />Mr. McCown could accept .65 until further analysis was completed through the Infill Compatibility <br />Standards (ICS) process. <br /> <br />Ms. Hansen said .75 that appeared in the table of the white paper on this topic, and came from the <br />community involvement process. <br /> <br />Mr. Hledik was in favor of moving forward with the proposed amendment language of .75 and asking the <br />ICS Task Team to study it in further depth. <br /> <br />Ms. Gardner said the community worked closely with Ms. Hansen in developing the recommendation. <br />The community group wanted some interim protection while the ICS Task Team worked through its <br />process. <br /> <br />Mr. Carroll requested that the Commission vote individually on the proposed amendments to enable <br />Commissioners to register their descent on the individual issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Carroll moved to recommend approval of Amendment 3—Residential <br />Density Calculations. There was no second to the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Duncan, seconded by Ms. Kneeland, moved to recommend approval of <br />Amendment 3—Residential Density Calculations as indicated in the staff report, <br />with a modification from .75 to .50, showing half would be above and half would <br />be below. He further moved that the issue be forwarded to the Infill <br />Compatibility Standards Task Team for further analysis by staff and Task Team <br />to return to the Planning Commission with a recommendation. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless was concerned with rejecting the number that had been recommended by the community. <br />He said it needed to go to the ICS Task Team for further analysis. Ms. Kneeland agreed with Mr. <br />MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission June 2, 2008 Page 5 <br /> <br />