My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/25/08 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2008
>
CC Minutes - 02/25/08 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:46 AM
Creation date
6/23/2008 11:26:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/25/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F. Adoption of Resolution 4930 Amending Eugene City Council Operating Agreements and <br />Repealing Resolution 4872 <br /> G. Approval of Construction Excise Tax—Bethel School District <br /> <br />Councilor Clark pulled item D. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka pulled item C. <br /> <br />Councilor Pyror, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to accept the Consent Calendar <br />with the exception of items C and D. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka recalled his desire, expressed at the work session on the topic, that Eugene Water & <br />Electric Board (EWEB) would install a solar photovoltaic project on the roof of its new building. He hoped <br />the EWEB board would direct staff or ask a private party to install such a project on its new building. He <br />found it ironic that in the same week as The Register-Guard chose to do an editorial stating that solar power <br />did not work and was not cost-effective, it ran an article about Pepsi’s new solar rooftop system and how <br />effective it was. He hoped EWEB would soon announce it would do the same. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said he had asked about EWEB’s plan to guarantee the use of the proceeds of the sale of <br />the land the utility would be leaving to buy down the bonds. The council had not heard a guarantee but that <br />a statement was planned. He hoped the EWEB commissioners would come out with a statement to that <br />effect as it would lower everyone’s power costs. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark said he would vote to support the bonds because shortly after the work session he had met <br />with EWEB staff members and discussed the issue with several board members sufficiently to be convinced <br />that it was the board’s intent to buy back the cots of the bonds with the sale of the river front property, <br />which would give the utility the ability to build a green building and perhaps do what Councilor Zelenka <br />wanted. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said she strongly supported solar-generated power but believed the places that the largest <br />solar arrays were being installed were on private buildings because they received a tax credit the public <br />buildings could not receive at this time. It would be easier to install such facilities on publicly constructed <br />buildings if the tax credits were available to governments. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; Item C passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Speaking to Mayor Piercy’s remarks, Councilor Zelenka maintained that EWEB could work with a third- <br />party to install a solar array with the tax benefit to accrue to a third party entity who could use the tax <br />credits. He recalled that the Legislature passed a bill calling for one percent for solar but EWEB had not yet <br />presented him with its plans in that regard. He hoped it would do so soon so Eugene could live up to its <br />billing as the fifth greenest city in America. <br /> <br />Speaking to Item D, Councilor Clark said the Agenda Item Summary listed groups who endorsed it; he <br />asked Planner Carolyn Weiss who declined to endorse it. Ms. Weiss deferred to Jeff Krueger of LCOG, who <br />indicated that the Convention and Visitors Association of Lane County had declined to endorse the plan. <br />Councilor Clark recalled that the association had been concerned that the visioning plan in question would <br />become a land use plan over time. He asked how many private acres were involved. Mr. Krueger said that <br />7,500 acres of habitat block were in public and private ownership, the majority in private; he emphasized the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 25, 2008 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.