Laserfiche WebLink
effort was voluntary. For the most part, the properties would remain in private ownership with the potential <br />of taxing incentives to improve them. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark indicated he would likely vote for the motion because he favored the vision but the plan <br />included thousands of acres of private land targeted for acquisition by some government body. Eugene had <br />some very controversial discussions about such acquisitions and he did not want to be in the position of <br />creating years of conflict down the road, and wanted to create a vision that worked and did not want to go <br />down the road of condemnation to bring the vision to fruition. He hoped the City worked with residents <br />better than it had to this point. He said that many people’s rights needed to be safeguarded along the way. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon agreed with the remarks of Councilor Clark. She said her chief objection was that the <br />information came to the council on February 7 and now she was being asked to approve it as a consent <br />calendar item. She called for a work session to be scheduled and a public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Pyror expressed appreciation for the concerns expressed previously but said he was comfortable <br />with the plan given how many people had vetted it. He noted that he had reviewed the document in a <br />different context. He said it was hard to separate the vision from the body that implemented it. That was <br />the body’s problem, not the visionary document. He supported the plan and encouraged the council to be <br />diligent. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka endorsed the vision. At his request, Mr. Krueger reviewed the vision statement. <br />Councilor Zelenka thought that in the future, people would think the vision was good. He really supported it <br />and was impressed by those who supported it. He also liked the map, and hoped that those who owned <br />private property along the trail would share the vision and “cooperate.” <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said the council was charged by its residents to look out for future generations, and she <br />thought the plan was a perfect example of that. She noted the land acquired through the Forest Legacy was <br />part of the vision. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy did not think the council would do anything irresponsible in carrying out the vision. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark thought the vision was good and it was the council’s job to articulate a larger vision. <br />However, he asked the staff to bear in mind the need to be straightforward; if there was land the City wanted <br />to protect it should change the zone as appropriate and list it as land to be protected rather than land to be <br />built on. <br /> Roll call vote; Item D passed, 6:1; Councilor Solomon voting no. <br /> <br /> <br />3. ACTION: <br />RATIFICATION OF COUNCIL COMMITTEEE ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL <br /> RELATIONS OF JANUARY 3, 2008 <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to ratify the actions of the Council <br />Committee on Intergovernmental Relations as set forth in the minutes of January 3, 2008. <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 25, 2008 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />