Laserfiche WebLink
16.217(4)(v) (aa) The Director may grant an administrative variance to decrease <br /> the setback upon showing that the eventual utilization of the site is compatible <br /> with a smaller setback up to the following minimums: <br /> (i-i) Fifty feet from the boundary of any nonresidential zone, or the right-of- <br /> way of an existing street or road. <br /> (ii-ii) One hundred feet from the boundary of a residential zone. <br /> <br />Lane County has approved this variance, pending approval of the comprehensive plan <br />amendments and zone change. Conditions of approval applied to mining operations <br />would not automatically apply to construction of the aquaclude if it is not considered a <br />mining activity; however, it is the County’s intention to enforce all descriptions of <br />construction activities and mitigation measures included in the application as part of the <br />project description. The City can argue that construction of the aquaclude is, in fact, a <br />mining operation and subject to all DEQ setbacks and regulations, but ultimately the <br />decision rests with Lane County. State definitions of “Mining” are attached at the end of <br />the staff analysis. <br /> <br />Most of the land located inside the UGB adjacent to the expansion site is zoned for <br />residential use, except that the residential area along Echo Lane and the 8 acre undivided <br />Kempf property are zoned “Agriculture” and the 4J property to the north is zoned “Public <br />Land.” Lane Code would apply the 50-foot setback to these properties not zoned <br />Residential. Where a right-of-way in a residential zone abuts the expansion area, such as <br />portions of Hunsaker Lane, the 50-foot setback would apply. The existing residences that <br />would be most impacted by the reduced setback area are some along Hunsaker Lane on <br />the southerly side of the expansion site (located within 150 feet of the aquaclude <br />construction), and homes located at the southern end of Admiral Street, located northerly <br />of the expansion site (with houses within 200 feet of the aquaclude). Construction of the <br />aquaclude would occur at an early stage of use of the expansion site and, while <br />construction of each segment would be of relatively limited duration, construction of the <br />entire aquaclude may take 6-8 years. In the end, whether installation of the aquaclude is <br />treated as a construction activity or mining, the net effect to the nearest residences would <br />be the same as if mining were allowed 50-100 feet nearer than the standard setback, <br />except that the aquaclude will be more quickly backfilled to grade level. <br /> <br />Specific possible impacts of the reduced setback are discussed below. <br /> <br /> Noise. The variance would allow excavation/construction activities 50-100 feet <br />closer to some existing residences. Staff does not find in the record a succinct summary <br />of the difference this would cause in terms of noise (i.e., comparing the noise at the 50 <br />and 150 foot setbacks from residential areas, for instance). DSA Engineers prepared a <br />report for the applicant to study the noise impacts of the aquaclude construction (Exhibit <br />221 in the record). It states that construction of the aquaclude would be exempt from <br />DEQ noise regulation (if it is not considered a mining activity), but DSA used DEQ noise <br />standards as a benchmark for their recommendations. DSA suggests that the distance <br />between the excavation and residences can be less and still meet noise standards if <br />excavation activities by certain equipment were limited to less than 30 minutes each hour <br /> <br />