My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 02/28/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:23:34 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 3:27:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the level of service and that these remain unchanged from the earlier version. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thanked staff for the comprehensive and comprehensible documents. She asked if whether <br />the council voted to approve the plan or voted to accept the plan would make a difference in the <br />accreditation process. City Manager Taylor responded that it did not. Chief Tallon clarified that if the <br />council accepted the document, it would then be acknowledging that the Fire Department was using this <br />process to measure risk and making recommendations on how to cover that risk. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said that response time was a key issue for her. She cited two instances in her experience as <br />a registered nurse wherein response time had made a tremendous difference in the outcome for a patient. <br />She objected to the fact that the goals for response time were greater than the need. She observed that the <br />national standard was a four-minute response, but all incidents in Eugene were averaging at least nine <br />minutes for a response. She pointed out that last year's goal was a six-and-a-half minute response time. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly also complimented the document, calling it detailed. He would support a motion to accept the <br />document. He felt uneasy about ~upporting a motion to approve the document given the changed goals for <br />response time. He thought standards were being relaxed as last year the goal had been a six-and-a-half <br />minute response time 90 percent of the time and now the goal had been changed to a seven-minute <br />response time 80 percent of the time. He asked why the response time goals had been changed. <br /> <br />Responding to Mr. Kelly, Chief Obadal stated that the former goals could not be met. She said it had been <br />hoped this could be improved operationally and the department had not been able to do so. She <br />acknowledged the goals had been relaxed but reiterated that it was because the goals need to be attainable. <br />She related that the Accreditation Commission required the department to look at the both the depart- <br />ment's response and the call-in response times. She said when all the components were added up it <br />looked like a long time. <br /> <br />In response to another question from Mr. Kelly, Chief Obadal stated that the change in the percentage of <br />time response times were achieved had been a result of understanding what different standards were <br />across the country and also because this was the percentage that the department could achieve. She noted <br />that she had seen, in her peer review capacity, departments with a goal to achieve a good response time 70 <br />percent of the time. <br /> <br />Chief Tallon added that the change in response time goals had largely been due to Chief Obadal's work as <br />an assessor with other departments and her understanding of the requirements for accreditation. He <br />thought the factor that was most telling for the decision-makers was the response reliability as a city. He <br />cited pages 71 and 72 which provided three years of data per station. He said, since 1991, each year the <br />response reliability had gone down. He called attention, in particular, to the Valley River area which had <br />lost an engine company due to funding issues. He underscored that response time had increased due to the <br />growth of the community, an increase in the frequency of incidents, and the spread of population into the <br />Santa Clara area. As a point of information, he stated that there were very few, if any, departments in the <br />United States that had a response time of four minutes 90 percent of the time, though the national standard <br />suggested that response time. <br /> <br />Mr. Papa lauded the document. He noted that on page 3 it said Eugene had received a Class II fire <br />suppression rating. He asked what a Class I rating would be. Chief Tallon responded that this was the <br />ISO rating upon which homeowners and business insurance rates were partially based. He said, nation- <br />wide, he thought there were less than ten Class I fire departments and less than 90 that were Class II. He <br />stated that fire departments were proud to be rated Class II and that some paint it on the sides of their fire <br />trucks. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 26, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.