My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-16 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2016
>
09-26-2016
>
09-26-16 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2016 9:54:10 AM
Creation date
9/23/2016 9:53:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/26/2016
CMO_Effective_Date
9/26/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From Greg Giesy 09/19/2016 <br />Dear Mayor and City Council, <br />The South Willamette issue is so far off the tracks that I dont know if wecan ever repair the alienation it <br />has caused and I believethat we are still headingin thewrong direction.The meeting today was not <br />wanted by most of the people involved in thisissue. Thefocus of the meeting that everyone in Eugene <br />canstate what the residents in the South Willamette area should wantonly causes more feeling that <br />those residentshavelittle choicebutto except theirfate withtheirfeelings mattering less thanpeople <br />whowontneedtolivewiththe outcome. <br />I have been on the Friendly Area Neighbors (FAN) Board for eighteen years and during that time we <br /> asked repeatedly for a refinement plan. When I first started on the FAN Board long time members <br />have <br />told me that the boardhadtriedfor 20 years before I joined toget a refinement plan for the <br />neighborhood. <br />The South Willamette Special Area Zone started with us being refused a refinement plan but the city was <br />willing todo something that would cost less. Nowthat six years have been wasted and the price of the <br />SpecialAreaZone, that has been cancelled, isseveraltimes what a refinement plan would havecost. <br />Maybe we shouldrethink the citysstance onnot doing refinement plans. <br />Over the last year there have been many debates over the pros and cons of refinement plans. The one <br />thing it has over how the special area zone washandled is thatit starts with a neighborhood planning <br />committeehelpedbycitystafftalkingto residentsaboutwhat the area shouldlook like and them <br />actuallywalking the neighborhood. <br />The special area zone hadmeeting with anyone that wanted to attend writing ideas onmapsandcity <br />staff deciding what they wanted to promote from the statements on the maps.It also expandedoutof <br />FANtotwo neighborhoods thathadlittle idea that the special area zone washappening and then went <br />to code before walking the area to see if whatwas on the maps made any sense. <br />Refinement plans lookat traffic, parking, solaraccess, gentrification, and livability in generalwhichwas <br />notadequately done for the special area zone. <br />I will finishwith going beyond weighing the benefits and short comings of refinement plans versus <br />special areazones to saythe citys biggest problem with many of thethingsit does is thelack of <br />communication funding to get information out to its citizens. Going back to the drawing board to <br />rehashthings costmany times what it would costtomake people aware ofwhat was happening. <br />Sincerely, <br />GregGiesy <br />Friendly Area NeighborsBoardMember <br />th <br />42 W. 19Avenue <br />541.687.1858 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.