09-26-16 Work Session - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

From Wayne Gaddy 09/19/2016 I want expressmy support forthe motion sponsored by MikeClark some months ago that was initially passed bythe council. I haven't seen the Brown-Clark proposal referred to at tonight'spublic forumat South Eugene High but I gather it's along those lines. I urge you to move carefully on rezoning in the Southeastern area oftown. This is already a densely populated area of many modest homes owned by people of modest incomes. A number of us are senior citizens who have limited physical and financial resources to move if they find a multi-story apartment building built right up to their property line. For someone likemewhohas spent 29years remodeling inside and building an attractive yard and garden outside thatradical a change would be intolerable. If youwant to rezone properties that are being used asrentals that's one thing. No homeowner who bought a residence to live in and does live with the expectation that similar homes would be on either side should have kind of a change imposed adjoining property without his /her consent orcompensation. MUPTE should not be extended further south or anywhere else. If there really is a need foran increase in apartment buildings they willbe built It's called thefree market.Rather than destroy thecharacterof neighborhoods, I would rather see the Urban GrowthBoundary expanded toaccommodate a rapid population growth thanto see wide swaths of our city turned into a sea of condos and tenements like What's happening in central Seattle. This is an area that is carrying more traffic than its streets can handle. Now that school is back in session, afternoon traffic on Willamette is considerably worse and I expect it to get worse when the university opens for fall term. The Hub is an eyesore that you would have expected to see in East Berlinbutatleastit'son a transportationcorridor. Yourplanningdepartmentapproved a zoning changeacrossthestreetonthreeadjoininglots thathad single houses, lawns, and the ability to see a skyline above them. The planner incharge toldme there wouldbe four discrete duplexes wherethere were three houses, therewasnoway an apartment building could be built and it would be no taller than the 2 story houses in the immediate area. All three of those promises were wrong. The owner bragged to his workers that he had already flipped thebuildingto a California corporation for a profit of $300,000. One subcontractor told me thebuildingwas so cheaply built itwould start falling apart within ten years as he thinks Capstone will (Yes, he did work on that project) I feel like a fool for trustingyour planning department whenover the years I'd been warned by people not to trust city staff. I'll never make that mistake again. The cityneedsto set up a structure whereby neighborhood people are brought in from the beginning to develop changes in zoning and liveability. The planning departmentshouldnotbeabletogetyoutoimposeradicalchangeswhen there is clearly strong opposition to those who will suffer from the changes. Frankly, I think the city government is more responsive to the affluent and the developers.who see modest neighborhoods as easy pickings. It also looks like you would never do this to the most expensive neighborhoods that live on big spreads and enjoy views of empty land in the distance and little traffic or noise in their areas. Our area includes decades long residents who have always provided the strongest yes votes when the city has needed money from voters I think attention should be paid to thoseof us who have contributed to ourcity for decades as opposed to focusing so intently on those who may come here in the future and may not set roots here. Those whocomehere shoulddo some planning as I did 41 years ago to make sure they aregoingto a place where they can find affordable housing. All neighborhoods should share equally the burdensthat future growth may bring. Wayne Gaddy