Laserfiche WebLink
The department has posted its policy on complaints and a detailed explanation of <br />the complaint and investigation process on its website. This is clearly a valid practice <br />and demonstrates the EPD's efforts to create a transparent process. There are <br />alternative methods to submit complaints to accommodate those persons who are <br />timid about making the complaint at a police facility.9 However, the website policy <br />also indicates "The department routinely checks the police records of the people <br />with whom we have contact, including people who file complaints. If a Police <br />Officer has contact with you and is aware of a warrant, he/she is legally compelled <br />to arrest you." The purpose of this statement is troubling. Anytime a police officer <br />suspects a person may have an open warrant, a check should be made. However, to <br />warn persons their participation in the complaint process could result in their arrest <br />sends a discouraging message. Moreover, if there is a chance a wanted person could <br />fall into the hands of the police for whatever the reason, wily would the department <br />want to issue a warning for them to stay away? On a positive note, tile document <br />encourages illegal immigrants to contact the department by openly stating that it is <br />not the department's job to enforce immigration laws. If the department's emphasis <br />is on working with the public to determine, and where needed, correct the quality of <br />police service, there must be no obstacles placed in the way to discourage the <br />public's ability to freely air issues. <br /> <br />In the past, when a complaint was received, the supervisor assessed it immediately <br />to determine if it was a complaint (a breach of policy) or an inquiry (a question <br />about police procedure or policy). If it was determined to be a complainb it went to <br />IA for review and assignment. Except for criminal or very serious matters handled <br />by cri~ninal investigators or IA, most investigations (known as Blue Folders) were <br /> <br />9 An additional question could be asked; who determines or-because of a bias harbored due to the record of a <br />complaint-who dismisses a complaint? Even criminals can have legitimate complaints. Only a proper and <br />equitable decision on the front-end can make the system of receiving complaints fair to all who desire to file. A <br />track record of frivolous complaints can be considered, however, it should be done so and dealt with accordingly <br />after sufficient reason has been established. <br /> <br /> 76 <br /> <br /> <br />