My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - ICMA/PERF Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 03/09/05 WS
>
Item A - ICMA/PERF Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:10 PM
Creation date
3/2/2005 3:34:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
directed to the supervisor of the named officer for completion3° Blue Folder <br />progress was tracked, but the department was lax in demanding prompt completion <br />of investigations, allowing many to linger too long. <br /> <br />If it was determined by the receiving supervisor or IA that the matter was no more <br />than an inquiry, it was addressed immediately. However, inquiries were not tracked <br />in any way for statistical purposes. This negated the opportunity to recognize <br />recurring inquiries, thereby forfeiting the ability to identify problem policies or <br />those areas requiring officer training or public education. Moreover, the informality <br />of this process reportedly left some members of the public feeling unsatisfied when <br />their inquiry was unilaterally cleared without any investigation or further action <br />taken. This problem was noted among the concerns expressed by the Police <br />Commission (December 9, 2004), namely that the public is often uncertain if what <br />happened was wrong because the public is unsure of laws and procedures <br />governing police conduct. <br /> <br />Currently, complaints can be taken on-line, at the department's front counter, <br />through 911, via the Human Rights Commission, at public safety stations, and by the <br />city manager's office among other venues. In response to community concerns and <br />the auditor's report (2004), the chief of police implemented a new policy in which all <br />matters are initially considered complaints. Details of the complaint process can be <br />accessed on-line or through pre-printed forms which can be obtained at police <br />headquarters and several public safety stations. Complaints can be taken in person <br />at neutral locations limiting the stress some persons may feel about complaining to <br />the police about the police. Volunteer advocates and interpreters are also available <br />to facilitate the process for persons needing assistance~ <br /> <br />10 This is murky and borders on poor policy. What is the line of demarcation between serious and very serious <br />matters? ls it a matter that is a personal decision, or are definite guidelines established? <br /> <br /> 77 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.