My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-16 Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2016
>
10-24-2016
>
10-24-16 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2016 11:28:01 AM
Creation date
10/21/2016 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/24/2016
CMO_Effective_Date
7/15/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ExhibitC <br />PlanningDirector'sFindingsandRecommendation <br />AnnexationRequestfortheStadterProperty <br />(CityFileA167) <br />ApplicationSubmitted:August2,2016 <br />Applicant:JohnandMaureenStadter <br />PropertyIncludedinAnnexationRequest:TaxLot303of!ƭƭĻƭƭƚƩƭMap17030800 <br />Zoning:AGAgriculturalwith/ULUrbanizableLandsOverlay <br />Location:4075GilhamRoad(locatedinNortheastEugene) <br />Representative:RichardSatre,SchirmerSatreGroup <br />LeadCityStaff:ErikBergJohansen,CityofEugenePlanningDivision,541/6825437 <br />EVALULATION: <br />Basedontheinformationprovidedbytheapplicant,theCityhasdeterminedthatthisrequestcomplieswithEugene <br />Code(EC)Section9.7805AnnexationApplicability.Assuch,itissubjecttoreviewandapprovalinaccordancewith <br />therequirements,applicationcriteriaandproceduresofEC9.7800through9.7835.Theapplicableapprovalcriteria <br />arepresentedbelowinboldtypefacewithfindingsandconclusionsfollowingeach. <br />EC9.7825(1)ThelandproposedtobeannexediswithintheĭźƷǤƭurbangrowthboundaryandis: <br />(a)Contiguoustothecitylimits;or <br />(b)Separatedfromthecityonlybyapublicrightofwayorastream,bay,lakeorotherbodyofwater. <br />CompliesFindings:TheannexationareaiswithintheCity'surbangrowthboundary(UGB),andas <br />proposed,willbeseparatedfromthecityonlybyapublicrightofway,consistentwith <br />YESNO <br />subsection(b). <br />EC9.7825(2)TheproposedannexationisconsistentwithapplicablepoliciesintheMetroPlanandinanyapplicable <br />refinementplans. <br />CompliesFindings:SeveralpoliciesfromtheMetroPlanprovidesupportforthisannexationby <br />encouragingcompacturbangrowthtoachieveefficientuseoflandandurbanserviceprovisions <br />YESNO <br />withintheUGB,includingthefollowingpoliciesfromtheGrowthManagementsection(in italic <br />text): <br />Policy8.LandwithintheUGBmaybeconvertedfromurbanizabletourbanonlythrough <br />annexationtoacitywhenitisfoundthat: <br />a.Aminimumlevelofkeyurbanfacilitiesandservicescanbeprovidedtothearea <br />inanorderlyandefficientmanner. <br />b.Therewillbealogicalareaandtimewithinwhichtodeliverurbanservicesand <br />facilities.Conversionofurbanizablelandtourbanshallalsobeconsistentwith <br />theMetroPlan.(pageIIC4) <br />Policy10.Annexationtoacitythroughnormalprocessesshallcontinuetobethehighest <br />priority.(pageIIC5). <br />Policy15.Ultimately,landwithintheUGBshallbeannexedtoacityandprovidedwiththe <br />requiredminimumlevelofurbanfacilitiesandservices.Whilethetimeframefor <br />annexationmayvary,annexationshouldoccuraslandtransitionsfromurbanizable <br />tourban.(pageIIC5) <br />Stadter,JohnandMaureen(A167)October2016Page1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.