My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-16 Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2016
>
10-24-2016
>
10-24-16 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2016 11:28:01 AM
Creation date
10/21/2016 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/24/2016
CMO_Effective_Date
7/15/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 percent or more of the total existing building square footage on the ther of the following: New development of vacant sites (excluding development that consists only of new or An expansion <br /> of 20 percent or more of the total existing building square footage on the less the above, may obtain approval <br /> <br /> <br />. Site review provisions shall be applied when any of the following conditions exist: <br />applicant specifically request in the application that the city apply the criteria at EC 9.8440 <br />No development permit shall be issued by the <br />Property is zoned with the /SR overlay zone and the proposal would result in either of the <br />ATTACHMENT A <br />The proposed use on the property is identified as a use which requires site review under <br />proposing needed housing shall be reviewed through the Type II site review procedures <br />New development of vacant sites (excluding partitions and any development that <br />The application proposes needed housing, as defined by State statutes. Applications <br />un <br />, or the final planned unit development <br /> <br />Needed Housing <br />other provisions of this land use code and the proposal would result in ei <br /> <br />\] <br />- <br />, or (3) <br />Site Review Approval Criteria <br />\[ <br /> <br />(2) <br />consists only of new or expanded parking areas). <br /> <br />or <br />\] <br />, <br />\[ <br />In lieu of site review, an application that falls within (1) <br /> <br />city prior to approval of the site review application <br />rough the Planned Unit Development process. <br /> <br />\] <br />. <br />General <br /> <br />Legal <br />Type: <br />utilizing the criteria at EC 9.8445 <br /> <br />expanded parking areas). <br /> <br />- <br />Site Review Approval Criteria <br /> <br />development site.development site. <br />An expansion of 2 <br /> <br />following: <br />Applicability <br /> <br />. <br />application <br /> <br />(a)(b)(a)(b) <br /> <br />Proposed Change: <br /> <br /> <br />(3) <br />(1)(2) <br />th <br />\[ <br /> <br />9.8430 <br /> <br />partitions, subdivisions and a site review application is , which <br />conditional use <br />As <br />also <br />such, this provision needs to be <br />applications proposing needed <br />inconsistent with state law. <br /> <br /> <br />that <br /> <br />Review Applicability <br />s) <br />unreasonable cost and delay <br />planned unit development <br />results in <br />equirement <br />including <br />, and <br />The r <br /> <br />redundant <br />removed. <br /> <br />( <br />permits, <br />complete <br />Site <br />housing <br /> <br />Issue: <br /> <br />20. <br /> <br />is <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.