Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> <br /> SIMILAR TO THAT IN ORS 807.570(4) IN SITUATIONS WHERE A <br /> DRIVER FAILS TO PRESENT A DRIVER'S LICENSE. <br /> <br /> SB 0~36 1/12/2005 1/26/2005 PREVAILING WAGE PRI 3 OPPOSE <br />RELATING RELATING TO FLAGGERS EMPLOYED ON PROJECTS REGULATED UNDER FEDERAL <br />CLAUSE DAVIS-BACON ACT; AMENDING ORS 279A.010 AND 279C.810. <br /> <br />TITLE REMOVES REQUIREMENT THAT CONTRACTORs AND SUBCONTRACTORS PAY <br /> FLAGGERS STATE PREVAILING WAGE RATE ON PROJECT REGULATED UNDER <br /> FEDERAL DAVIS-BACON ACT. <br /> <br /> .pOL <br /> CONTACT RESPONDENT DEPARTMENT UPDATED PRIORITY POLICY Nui~.RECO~NDATiON <br /> CAROL CAROL <br /> POMES POMES CS-FCS 1/14/2005 <br /> COMMENTS: DEFER TO PWA OR PWE ON THIS BILL. <br /> <br /> ERIC ERIC <br /> JONES JONES PWA 2/4/2005 PRI 3 NO NEUTRAL <br /> COMMENTS: ONLY $0.05 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FEDERAL WITH STATE WAGE <br /> RATES. NO DISCERNABLE EFFECT ON CITY COSTS. - REVIEWED <br /> BY PAUL KLOPE <br /> <br /> JEROME JEROME <br /> LIDZ LIDZ ATTORNEY 1/20/2005 PRI 3 SUPPORT <br /> COMMENTS: I DEFER TO PUBLIC WORKS ON THIS BILL. IN THE ABSENCE OF <br /> OTHER INFORMATION, I WOULD THINK THAT NOT HAVING TO PAY <br /> PREVAILING WAGE TO FLAGGERS WOULD SAVE THE CITY SOME <br /> MONEY. HOWEVER, I DOUBT THE SAVINGS WOULD BE <br /> SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY MUCH STAFF TIME ON THE <br /> BILL. <br /> <br /> <br />