Laserfiche WebLink
Eugene Police Department <br /> <br /> 777 Pearl St, Room 107 <br /> Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> www. ci.eugene.or, us <br /> <br />Date: March 1, 2005 <br />To: Mayor Piercy and City Council <br /> <br />From: Robert M. Lehner, Chief of Police <br /> 682-5102 <br /> <br />Subject: HB 2390 <br /> <br />The IGR Committee, at its February 11 meeting, requested some examples as to how HB 2390 might be <br />applied if it were enacted. Specifically, they were interested in some examples of crimes (which would <br />be covered by the bill) as opposed to violations (which would not be covered). This memo is intended to <br />provide that information. <br /> <br />HB 2390 would create the offense of refusal to identify if, "after having been specifically informed by a <br />peace officer that the person's identity is being requested in connection with the investigation of a crime, <br />the person refuses or fails to accurately report the person's identity in response to the officer's demand." <br />The term "identity" is defined as the person's true name and date of birth. Contrary to most criminal <br />statutes, this bill specifies that a person arrested for this offense "may be detained only for the time <br />reasonably necessary to investigate and establish the person's identity." This portion of the bill is <br />patterned after ORS 807.570, which creates the crime of failure to carry or present a driver's license, but <br />restricts the length of detention to the time "reasonably necessary to investigate and verify the person's <br />identity." <br /> <br />The ability to accurately identify persons who may have information relevant to a criminal investigation <br />is very important, both in terms of gaining the information needed to successfully complete the <br />investigation, and to make sure that investigating officers have the true names and dates of birth (a critical <br />identifier) of those who may be witnesses or suspects. A thorough investigation serves the public interest <br />by ensuring that people breaking the law are held accountable for their actions and ensuring that innocent <br />members of the community are protected. For these reasons, we feel passage of the bill would aid our <br />ability to conduct investigations in some of the situations that we encounter. <br /> <br />This bill restricts the applicability of this proposed offense of refusal to identify to the investigation of a <br />"crime", which is defined in ORS 161.515 as a misdemeanor or felony for which a sentence of <br />imprisonment is authorized (i.e., incarceration in either jail or prison). Most offenses which are crimes <br />under state law, and for which a municipal ordinance has been adopted, would be crimes under city <br />ordinance as well (e.g., theft, shoplifting, assault, trespass, criminal mischief, weapons offenses, <br />menacing, intimidation). The majority of motor vehicle violations are not crimes, and this bill would <br />apply only those more serious offenses for which a person could be sentenced to a period of incarceration <br />(e.g., DUll, reckless driving, hit and run). Many other city ordinance violations are not crimes. Attached <br />is a list of city ordinance violations which are crimes under the city code. <br /> <br /> <br />