My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4875
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2006 No. 4856-4897
>
Resolution No. 4875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:03 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 4:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/12/2006
Document_Number
4875
CMO_Effective_Date
6/12/2006
Repeal_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The reimbursement fee is based on the value of available capacity in the system that will <br />serve growth. The improvement fee is based on future facility costs associated with <br />providin.g growth's additional capacity needs (above what is already available in the <br />system). Together, the reimbursement and improvement fees recover costs equal to <br />growth's capacity needs. <br /> <br />Existing system available capacity and future improvement costs needed to expand capacity <br />for growth are distributed to capacity parameters (average flow"peak flow, biochemical <br />oxygen demand [BOD], and total suspended solids [TSS]), and spread over the total growth <br />units projected for the period to determine weighted average reimbursement and <br />itrtprovement unit costs. The SDCs for individual developments are then determined by <br />applying the unit costs (by fee element and capacity parameter) to the individual <br />development estimated capacity requirements, and sununing the results. The total SDC for <br />each development is then reduced by any applicable credits for past and future capital <br />payments. <br /> <br />Table 2 provides an example calculation fora single capacity parameter. The numbers <br />included in the table are intended. to illustrate the methodology only (when applied to the <br />single capacity parameter of average flow); the numbers do not represent MWMC planning <br />criteria or cost data. Furthermore, the total SDC would include similar calculations for other <br />capacity parameters, (i.e., peak flow, BOD, and TSS). In the example provided, total system <br />capacity needs at the end of the planning period are 60 million gallons per day (mgd). <br />Existing users are estimated to require 45 mgd (90 percent) of existing capacity, leaving <br />5 mgd. (10 percent) available for growth. However, growth's total needs are 15 mgd, <br />meaning that additional, investment will be required to expand system capacity by 10 mgd. <br /> <br />TABLE 2 <br />Example Calculation forSingle (Average Flow) Capacity Parameter'" <br /> <br />Determine Capacity Needs <br />System wide CapaCity (mgd) <br />Existing Users (mgd) <br />Growth (mgd) <br /> <br />60 <br />45 <br />15 <br /> <br />Existing Future <br />System Expansion <br />50 10 <br />45 0 <br />5 10 <br />10% 100% <br />$50,000,000 $12,000,000 <br />$5,000,000 $12,000,000 <br />$333,333 $800,000 <br />0.00035 0.00035 <br />$116.67 $280.00 <br /> <br />Element <br /> <br />T atal <br /> <br />Determine Cost Basis Needs <br /> <br />System wide Cost <br />Growth Cost <br /> <br />$17,000,000 <br /> <br />Determine SDC Schedule <br /> <br />Weighted Average Unit Cost ($/mgd) <br />User Capacity Requirement (mgd) <br />Total SDC <br /> <br />$1,133,333 <br />0.00035 <br />$396.67 <br /> <br />*Example only; not MWMC specific <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.