My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4875
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2006 No. 4856-4897
>
Resolution No. 4875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:03 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 4:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/12/2006
Document_Number
4875
CMO_Effective_Date
6/12/2006
Repeal_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />· Project Cost Valuation (Improvement Fee) The method for valuing future projects. <br /> <br />· Project Cost Allocation (Improvement Fee) - The method for allocating future projects <br />to growth. <br /> <br />· Adjustments - Deductions or additions to the cost basis to recognize past or future <br />capital funding methods. <br /> <br />Each issue is discussed below. <br /> <br />Step One. Existing System Valuation <br /> <br />Calculation of the reimbursement fee begins with a review of MWMC's fixed asset records <br />to determine the value of the existing system. The system is valued based on'the inflation <br />adjusted original cost approach. Under this approach, the original cost of existing system <br />assets is adjusted by the Engineering News-Record national20-city average Construction Cost <br />, Index from the time of construction to estimate current values. The inflation adjusted cost <br />approach recognizes appreciation in the system since assets were constructed and assumes <br />that the wastewater system is maintained in perpetuity. <br /> <br />Step Two. Existing System Allocation <br /> <br />The'existing system allocation methodology, for use in determining the reimbursement fee <br />cost basis, is a three-step allocation process 1 comprised of the following steps, as illustrated <br />in Figure 2: <br /> <br />R-l. Allocate existing facility costs to facility process components (e.g., primary treatment, <br />secondary treatment). <br /> <br />R-2. Allocate costs by component to system capacity parameters (e.g., average flow, peak <br />flow). ' <br /> <br />R-3~ Allocate costs to growth based on estimated available capacity by service parameter. <br /> <br />The allocation of existing facility costs to facility process components is fairly straight- <br />forward, as most projects relate directly to an iildividual component (e.g., secondary <br />clarifiers are a part of secondary treatment), or support the entire treatment system (e.g., <br />, control systems). Existing facility costs (valued in terms of inflation-adjusted costs) by <br />process component are then allocated to capacity parameters based on the allocation <br />fractions in Table 3. <br /> <br />The final step in the allocation process is to multiply the costs by capacity parameter by the <br />percent of capacity available by parameter. To determine the available capacity for a <br />parameter, the amount of capacity that is currently being used (or required for existing, <br />users) is subtracted from the current rated capacity. U the current capacity requirement is <br />equal to or greater than the existing capacity, then there is no available capacity, and none of <br />the costs related to that parameter is included in the reimbursement fee cost basis. Table 4 <br />shows existing system available capacity by parameter based on system planning criteria. <br />The documentation for these figures is provided in Appendix C. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.