My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4875
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2006 No. 4856-4897
>
Resolution No. 4875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:03 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 4:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/12/2006
Document_Number
4875
CMO_Effective_Date
6/12/2006
Repeal_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-Secondary Treatment <br /> <br />Secondary treatment consists of two trains of aeration basins, eight secondary clarifiers, and <br />the associated blowers and pumps that function to treat and remove organic loading (BOD) <br />and to a lesser extent 1'55 from the wastewater. On a functional basis, secondary ,treatment <br />is regarded as removing roughly twice as much BOD relative to TSS. <br /> <br />, For the design criteria basis, typical secondary treatment sizing is governed by both average <br />and peak flow, but for MWMC, where the parallel primary j secondary approach (or high.- <br />rate clarification approach as a second choice) is proposed for peak flowmana~emeil:ti the <br />peak flows will be split between primary treatment and secondary treatment. Therefore, <br />only average flow is considered in the cost allocation. <br /> <br />Combining the functional basis with the design criteria basis; the following allocation is for <br />secondary treatment ' <br /> <br />. ,Average Flow-l/4 <br />. BOD -1/2 <br />. TSS-l/4 <br /> <br />Disinfection/Outfall <br /> <br />Following secondary treatment, the wastewater is disinfected (chlorinated and <br />dechlorinated) and discharged to the Willamette River through an outfall pipe. Both the <br />function and sizing of these facilities are entirely based on flow. The relationship between <br />the functional basis and design criteria is identical to that for the collection system facilities <br />and, therefore, the following allocation is for disinfec,tionj outfall: <br /> <br />. Average Flow - 1/4 <br />. Peak Flow - 3/4 <br /> <br />Biosolids <br /> <br />Biosolids are a byproduct of wastewater treatment and are produced during the primary <br />treatment,. secondary treatment, and to a lesser degree tertiary treabnent processes. The <br />three subcomponents used to allocatebiosolids treatment, handling, and disposal/ reuse <br />costs for purposes of SOC calculations are: <br /> <br />. General <br />. Dewatering <br />. Biocycle Farm <br /> <br />The definitions of these subcomponents are presented in Appendix C, Growth Capacity <br />Allocation Documentation. The three subcomponents were developed for the SDC update <br />because of the differing available capacities and growth percentages associated with <br />facilities in the subcomponents. However, m terms of allocating the facility compol)ents to <br />the wastewater parameters, the methodology is identical- independent of which <br />subcomponent is being considered. <br /> <br />A-24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.