Laserfiche WebLink
Reflections on <br />Because of the difficult history between the residents and City of Eugene, the process of <br />conducting neighborhood outreach in River Road and Santa Clara was daunting at the out- <br />the Process <br />set. Surprisingly, workshop facilitation was rewarding, interesting, and generally a positive <br />experience. Residents appreciated the opportunity to ask questions, they were thankful for <br />receiving basic information about services, and they enthusiastically discussed what they <br />liked and did not like about their neighborhood. The basic outreach methodology used in this <br />project could continue to be used in River Road and Santa Clara, or in other neighborhoods <br />in the Eugene area. <br />Residents participated in the workshops because they were interested in their community <br />and wanted a stake in the outcome of a neighborhood planning process. However, they <br />were concerned that their input would not have an impact. Many times in the workshops, <br />residents asked, “What will really come from these sessions?” It is critical that the transfer <br />of the Transition Project from the consultant group to the community organizations also result <br />in the transfer of responsibility to make recommendations to elected officials. <br />With the results of the public outreach, community leaders have essential information <br />Potential <br />needed to prioritize the Transition and Heritage Framework and create a strategic plan for <br />Next Steps <br />each neighborhood. The communities must remember to make a special effort to listen to <br />minority concerns – for instance, many low-income families value police patrols, high density <br />housing and affordable childcare provided by the River Road Park District – none of which <br />rated as a top priority for most workshop participants. Community leaders would also benefit <br />from working closely with elected officials and service providers to identify common goals. <br />River Road has the advantage of a strong neighborhood network, excellent commu- <br />nity facilities, and outstanding connections to the river, bike path, and downtown <br />Eugene. <br />Residents are motivated by what they have to lose, such as the rural neighborhood <br />feel and the viability of the Park District. These factors will help leaders move forward on <br />what is already clear in terms of community priorities: land use and governance. A next step <br />could be to evaluate the different neighborhoods within River Road in terms of values such <br />as density and rural qualities. Balancing the need for affordable housing with a desire for a <br />rural feel is difficult but possible. A useful final plan for River Road would be site-specific, <br />have the support of all facets of the community, and meet local and regional planning goals. <br />Santa Clara benefits from capacity, size, and location; it is a larger, more self- <br />sufficient community with easy access to shopping, farms, and – potentially – the Wil- <br />lamette River Greenway. <br />The challenge for Santa Clara is bring together leaders from both <br />City subdivisions and unincorporated areas to manage the growing pains of development <br />and create a vision for the future. Community leaders would benefit from focusing on issues <br />that are a priority for both City and unincorporated residents, such as the need for a recrea- <br />tion center and community park, development issues, alternative transportation, and a better <br />connection to the river. As with River Road, a site-specific plan would provide clarity for the <br />diverse neighborhoods within Santa Clara. Because it is challenging to organize a commu- <br />nity as large as Santa Clara and motivate residents to work toward new opportunities, lead- <br />ers must focus clearly on defined goals to achieve success. <br />The community organizations will need to carefully consider the structure and proc- <br />ess for future planning projects. <br />The community organization board could function in the <br />same capacity as a non-profit advisory board, providing vision and guidance for projects <br />managed by committed and experienced volunteers or paid staff. It will be critical for each <br />entity to respect the role of the other: the board as a guide and the project manager as an <br />administrator. The connection with City staff also needs definition – as a funder, they would <br />probably review and approve project proposals, evaluate project updates and final reports, <br />and base future funding on the success of past projects. The City neighborhood grants pro- <br />gram is an example of a successful model of collaboration. <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project—Public Outreach Report <br />8 <br /> <br />