Laserfiche WebLink
· Attachment A: February 10, 2004 Minutes of the Joint Work Session and Public <br /> Hearing of the Eugene and Springfield City Councils and Lane <br /> County Board of Commissioners <br /> · Attachment B: Testimony and additional information submitted for the February <br /> 10, 2004 public hearing record <br /> · Attachment C: Minutes of elected officials' meetings providing direction to <br /> remove urban reserves <br /> · Attachment D: Section IV: Summary of the Residential Land Supply and Demand <br /> Analysis <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> <br />Staff recommends the following additional or new amendments to the materials presented at the <br />February 10, 2004 public hearing in response to materials submitted for the record or to elected <br />officials' questions and comments at the hearing. No other changes to Exhibits A, B, or C are <br />recommended. <br /> <br /> Exhibit A: Metro Plan Housekeeping Revisions <br /> <br /> The following changes are reflected in Exhibit A: Metro Plan Housekeeping Revisions <br /> Replacement Pages, March 10, 2003, attached: <br /> <br /> · Replacement page II-C-6 to fix the typo that inadvertently marked the words "and <br /> electrical" for deletion in policy 917, in response to a question raised at the <br /> hearing. <br /> <br /> · Replacement Pages Ill-I- 1 through 111-I-3 to provide additional staff edits to the <br /> Historic Preservation Element to remove or update outdated material. <br /> <br /> The Eugene Modernism 1935-1965 historic context statement contains a strategy <br /> that states: "Strategy 19. Revise the Historic Preservation Element in the Metro <br /> Plan to eliminate outdated findings and policies. (High Priority) [Page 16.3]" <br /> Eugene's Historic Review Board identified the need to revise the Historic <br /> Preservation Element because it contains outdated wording for Finding #6, and <br /> Policies #6, #7, and #8. <br /> <br /> The purpose of the proposed changes are to remove the specific focus on <br /> identifying and protecting archeological resources and balance protection with all <br /> historic resource types which traditionally include buildings, districts, sites and <br /> objects. Archeological resources are traditionally classified as "sites." <br /> <br /> Finding 7 recommends removing the first sentence as it seems unnecessarily <br /> directed at archeological sites. Proposed wording is intended to be inclusive of <br /> historic and archeological sites. Policy 6 points to completing a working paper for <br /> resource management of archeological sites which we do not have funding for. <br /> <br />Metro Plan Periodic Review Text and Diagram Amendments Staff Notes Page 2 of 28 <br /> City Council Agenda page 304 <br /> <br /> <br />