Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />th <br />Joe Willis <br />, 1211 Southwest 5 Street, Suite 1600, Portland, provided a copy of a diagram of the property <br />for the council. He said the claimant’s representatives were not present under Eugene’s ordinance and <br />would not submit to it. He underscored that the claim had clearly been submitted under Ballot Measure 37. <br />He stated that a corporation acquired the property in question years before any of the restrictive ordinances <br />had been adopted. He averred that Measure 37 was designed to give relief for such ordinances. He said a <br />written demand for just compensation had been submitted and if it was not satisfactorily waived within 180 <br />days, his client would have the right to bring a civil action for just compensation in the Circuit Court that <br />would carry with it the rights of attorney fees and expenses, including experts. He also believed in <br />charging interest. He expressed his preference not to engage in this action. He said he would rather the <br />council look over the paperwork and if councilors had questions, the lawyers would try to respond to them. <br />He urged the council to grant the request and give his client a waiver. He added that Lane Plywood had <br />been in possession and control of the property at all times and this interest alone was sufficient to sustain <br />its right to make a Measure 37 claim. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked for an explanation of next steps in deciding the claim. Mr. Klein responded that <br />the council was scheduled to consider action on June 26. Before then, staff would evaluate the written and <br />oral testimony and would provide a memorandum containing advice, options, and risks. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting of the Eugene City Council and convened the meeting of the Eugene <br />Urban Renewal Agency at 8:13 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />5. PUBLIC HEARING ACTION: <br />and <br />Resolution 1039 of the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene Adopting the Budget, Mak- <br />ing Appropriations, and Declaring the Amount of Tax to be Certified for the Fiscal year Begin- <br />ning July 1, 2006, and Ending June 30, 2007 <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked Budget Manager Kitty Murdoch, to briefly review the Urban Renewal Budget <br />as recommended by the Budget Committee. <br /> <br />Ms. Murdoch reported that the Budget Committee met six times and held one public hearing on May 15 on <br />the proposed budget. She said the total budget for the two Urban Renewal Agency districts was $14.2 <br />million. The committee made one change to the proposed budget: the addition of $300,000 to the Capital <br />Budget for Farmers Market improvements. She related that the 14 members of the Budget Committee <br />unanimously approved the budget recommendation at their final meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Zachary Vishanoff <br />, Patterson Street, had several issues he wished to address: the backlog of street <br />repairs; an alleged no-bid contract for City Hall which he likened to “corporate welfare;” and the closure of <br />his neighborhood park. He felt urban renewal was “against open space, against parkland.” He called <br />urban renewal and the Multiple Unit Property Tax Exemption “development carrots” that allowed City <br />Hall to tear neighborhoods apart. He wanted more public involvement. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 12, 2006 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />