My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 07/10/06 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:26:49 PM
Creation date
7/3/2006 3:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. PUBLIC HEARING and ACTION: <br /> <br />Resolution 4878 Electing to Receive State Revenue Sharing Funds Pursuant to Section 221.770 of <br />Oregon Revised Statutes; and Resolution 4879 Certifying that the City of Eugene Provides the <br />Municipal Services Required by Oregon Revised Statutes Section 221.760; and Resolution 48800 <br />Adopting the Budget, Making Appropriations, Determining, Levying, and Categorizing the <br />Annual Property Tax Levy for the City of Eugene for the Fiscal Year Beginning July <br />Ad Valorem <br />1, 2006, and Ending June 30, 2007 <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor stated that the budget recommendation before the council was for the operating <br />budget for the City of Eugene. He called it a product of great work by the Budget Committee. He <br />requested the public hearing be combined for all three actions associated with the budget. He asked Ms. <br />Murdoch to review the budget. <br /> <br />Ms. Murdoch provided a brief overview of the operating budget for the City of Eugene, as forwarded by <br />the Budget Committee. She said public testimony had been received at all but the sixth meeting of the <br />committee and a public hearing was held on May 15. She stated that all items with the exception of two <br />had been recommended as proposed by the City Manager: the $1.5 million in a pay-off for Fire Bonds, <br />allocated to transportation system improvements instead; and $100,000 for neighborhoods switched from <br />one-time only to ongoing funding for the Neighborhood Initiative. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mary Otten <br />, 1612 Lincoln Street, spoke on behalf of the Accessibility Committee. She thanked the <br />council for allocating funds for audible pedestrian signals. She noted that the committee had been lobbying <br />for audible signals since February. She was thrilled the City Council and the Budget Committee had “seen <br />fit” to include money for them. <br /> <br />Charles Biggs <br />, 540 Antelope Way, expressed appreciation for the interest the Budget Committee and City <br />Council had shown in neighborhoods and neighborhood associations. He was impressed with the amount <br />of work the Budget Committee had done. He asked the City Council not to take action if any substantial <br />changes were made to the budget as proposed. <br /> <br />Zachary Vishanoff <br />, Patterson Street, asserted that the City decided to get involved with the Congress for <br />New Urbanism. He thought the public should be educated about this. He felt the pitfalls of smart growth <br />were onerous. <br /> <br />Mary Monette <br />, 3261 Richard Street, on behalf of the Friends of Golden Gardens Park, conveyed the <br />group’s appreciation to the council for listening to its concerns and challenging the group in not just <br />assuming that things were a “given.” They also appreciated inclusion of the park in the bond measure and <br />were “champing at the bit” to help get the measure approved by voters. She thanked the council in advance <br />for a positive vote. She added that the park was beautiful in the evening and urged the councilors to “check <br />it out.” <br /> <br />Mitzi Colbath <br />, 2230 Churchill Street, President of the Planning Commission, conveyed the commission’s <br />support for City Manager Taylor’s budget item for opportunity siting and infill standards. She stated that <br />the Planning Commission had, by unanimous vote, chosen to forward a request that one ongoing Full Time <br />Equivalent (FTE) employee be provided to assist with infill standards. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 12, 2006 Page 8 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.