Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C <br /> <br />Findings of Consistency with Eugene Code, <br />Metro Plan and West Eugene Wetlands Policies <br /> <br />Table of Contents <br />I. General Findings For All Sites In This Ordinance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br />A. Background Information ............................................... 3 <br />B. Analysis of Proposed Amendments Against Approval Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br />1. Metro Plan Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 <br />2. West Eugene Wetlands Plan Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 <br />3 . West Eugene Wetlands Plan Policies ............................... 12 <br />4. Table 3, Consistency with Refinement Plan Amendment Criteria. . . . . . . . . 15 <br />II. Supplemental Findings on EWEB's Proposed Crow Substation Site (A5) . . . . . . . . . . . 17 <br />A. Consistency with Adopted Wetland Designation Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 <br />1. Protection Criteria . . . . . ',' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 <br />2. Development Criteria ........................................... 19 <br />3. Restoration Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 <br />4. Summary of Consistency with Wetland Designation Criteria ............ 21 <br />B. Consistency of Proposed Designations for the proposed EWEB Substation Site <br />with Approval Criteria for Refinement Plan Amendments .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 <br />1. Metro Plan Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 <br /> <br /> <br />2. WEWP Goals ................................................. 26 <br /> <br />3. WEWP Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 <br /> <br />4. Summary of Consistency with Adoption Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 <br />III. Supplemental Findings on Utility Corridor Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 <br />A. Background on Utility Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . 30 <br />B. Utility Corridor Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 <br />C. Analysis of Proposed Utility Corridor Designations For Consistency with <br />Approval Criteria for Proposed Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 <br />1. Metro Plan Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 <br /> <br /> <br />2. WEWP Goals ................................................. 36 <br /> <br />3. WEWP Policies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 <br /> <br />4. Summary of Consistency with Adoption Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 1 <br />