My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20200
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2000 No. 20184-20219
>
Ordinance No. 20200
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 11:00:20 AM
Creation date
7/7/2006 3:21:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/26/2000
Document_Number
20200
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />primarily on consistency with the goals and policies in the Metropolitan Area General Plan and <br />the West Eugene Wetlands Plan. Most of the Utility Corridor sites were identified based upon <br />information submitted to the City following the Planning Commission review. These new Utility <br />Corridor sites have either been added to an existing proposed amendment, or given a new <br />amendment number (a number followed by a letter). <br /> <br />A. Background Information <br /> <br />In the text below, each amendment will be referred to by number only, as numbered in Exhibit A. <br /> <br />Exhibit A contains maps showing the proposed amendments. Exhibit A also describes in <br />narrative form the proposed changes to the wetland designations map. These items are numbered <br />and listed in Exhibit A in alpha-numeric order by site name. The numbers assigned to each <br />amendment are the same as those used throughout the amendment process since 1996. New sites <br />and some of the newly identified Utility Corridor amendments have been given site labels with a <br />number followed by a letter (e.g., 39a). <br /> <br />B. Analysis of Proposed Amendments Against Approval Criteria <br /> <br />Section 9.145 of the Eugene Code gives the criteria used to determine whether a proposed plan <br />amendment should be approved or not. The proposed amendments must be consistent with the <br />criteria in section 9.145 to be approved. <br /> <br />Section 9.14S (2) "The planning commission shall review the proposed amendment <br />and receive evidence, and decide whether the proposed change is consistent with the <br />following approval criteria: (a) The plan amendment is consistent with the <br />Metropolitan Area General Plan;" <br /> <br />Findings: <br /> <br />The Metropolitan Plan (Metro Plan) diagram designates the affected properties for <br />a variety of land uses including heavy industrial, light-medium industrial, special <br />light industrial, commercial, high density residential, medium density residential, <br />low density residential and agriculture. Metropolitan Plan designations for each <br />affected tax lot are given in a separate document entitled "Affected Properties (all <br />ordinances)." Where apparent conflicts exist between Metro Plan policy and the <br />Metro Plan diagram, the text prevails. The analysis here relies primarily on the <br />text of the Metro Plan. <br /> <br />Eighteen of these proposed amendments would designate all or a portion of a site <br />for Protection or Restoration. These are shown in Table 1 below (see key <br />following table for Metro Plan Designation abbreviations.) <br /> <br />Table 1 <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.