Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of wetlands designated for protection as demonstrated in the above- <br />referenced alternatives analysis; <br />3) the utility lines are located so as to reduce the impact to wetlands <br />designated for protection as much as possible, and in no case shall a <br />cumulative area greater than 1 acre be re-designated from "protection" to <br />"utility corridor" for a new utility line; <br />4) unavoidable impacts will be mitigated through restoration of the project's <br />entire impact area; <br />5) there are no impacts to wetlands from new utility lines installed within the <br />Willow Creek Natural Area; and <br />6) impacts to rare plant and animal species will not occur. <br />e. Other than the activities described in this policy, these corridors shall be treated as <br />protected wetlands. Allowed activities shall be conducted in such a manner as to <br />minimize adverse impacts to the maximum extent possible upon the wetlands <br />within the corridor itself and within surrounding protected wetlands. Wetland <br />impacts shall be limited to the minimum area necessary. Utility agencies shall use <br />the best feasible technology to pinpoint the location of needed repairs prior to <br />excavation in order to limit the area of impact. <br />f. Except for emergency repairs, these activities shall be planned and timed to <br />minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. <br />g. All impacts shall be followed by restoration activities including: <br />1) backfilling with existing native soil within three feet of the surface <br />whenever possible, and in no case less than two feet; and <br />2) grading and re-seeding and/or replanting with appropriate native plant <br />species. <br />h. Any unavoidable impacts to rare plant species shall be mitigated through <br />coordinated transplanting or other measures." <br /> <br />This ordinance includes amendments to the Wetland Designations Map to designate <br />corridors within protected wetlands, as shown on the attached maps and narrative <br />descriptions in Exhibit A. <br /> <br />C. Analysis of Proposed Utility Corridor Designations For Consistency with <br />Approval Criteria for Proposed Amendments <br /> <br />Section 9.145(2) of the Eugene Code gives the criteria used to decide whether a proposed <br />plan amendment should be approved or not. The proposed amendments must be <br />consistent with the criteria in section 9.145(2) to be approved. The analysis below <br />considers the proposed amendments to designate certain corridors containing utilities as <br />Utility Corridor, which would allow maintenance, repairs and connections to existing <br />facilities, and construction of new facilities if protective conditions are met. <br /> <br />In a few cases, the Utility Corridor designation is proposed on a site that is currently <br />undesignated, but which would otherwise be proposed for Protection. These sites total 1 <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 33 <br />