Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site DA <br />Amendment # 32 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />Heavy industrial <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. Rare plants not likely due to <br /> disturbance and lack of suitable habitat. <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No Less than 10% of site is within the flood hazard area <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No Site is over 400 feet from Amazon Creek, and over 350 <br /> feet from the A-3 Channel <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland Yes Connected to Site B5 to east. <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No Majority of site is scotch pine tree farm. <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection No <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br />1. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland No Connected to Site B5 to east. <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 21" sanitary in Danebo Ave., 8" and 10" water in Danebo. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development Yes Bordered by industrial and residential uses on three sides. <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Tax lot has frontage on Danebo, which is a minor arterial. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities Yes Tree farm and mill use impacting wetlands. <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Contains hydric Soils Yes Natroy silty clay loam, A wbrig silty clay loam, Pengra <br /> silt loam. <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland Yes Disturbed by agricultural use. <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway Yes Most of tax lot is not wetland. <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 29.7 acres of which 2.2 acres is currently designated for <br />protection. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development, including area <br />now designated as Protection. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: Site is a tree farm, wetland area very disturbed, site has <br />services available for development. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 62 <br />