Ordinance No. 20200 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland Designation Criteria Site DB Amendment #33 . PROTECTION STANDARD I. NR Metro Plan Designation COMMENTS Low density residential, heavy industrial. PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS I. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not systematically surveyed. Rare plants not likely due to disturbance and lack of suitable habitat. 2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No Flood hazard area confined to A-3 Channel. 3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway Yes A-3 Channel borders property; 30-150 feet from 4. Surface water connection to protected wetland Yes Undesignated area appears to have surface water connection to currently protected Danebo Pond during heavy rainfall periods. 5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system Yes Complex of Danebo Pond, A-3 Channel and these adjacent wet fields provide important habitat. . 6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection No Contamination from adjacent site makes acquisition would further WEWP goals/objectives diffICUlt and may jeopardize potential of site for potential stonnwater treatment facilities. 7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No DEVELOPMENT STANDARD I. Approved Wetland Impact Permit COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS I. Isolated, disconnected wetland No 2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 21" sanitary in Danebo, 1 0" water in Danebo, A-3 Channel provides stormwater facility. 3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development No Surrounding land to north, east and southeast is undeveloped, with wetlands designated for development. To the west are industrial uses, within 100-300 feet of these wetlands, and to east is Beltline Road. 4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Danebo is a minor arterial. 5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives 6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities Yes Adjacent property has DEQ documented groundwater and soil contamination from lumber treatment facility. I RESTORATION STANDARD I. Permit-required wetland mitigation site COMMENTS RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS 1. Contains hydric Soils Yes Natroy silty clay loam covers over 15 acres. 2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland Yes 3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes 4. Lacks urban services No 5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway Yes I~etlands are within 30 feet of the A-3 Channel, a protected waterway. Total Wetland Acreage: 8.3 acres already designated for Protection, 6.6 acres undesignated. Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate wetlands on Tax Lot 400 (Bohemia) for Development, designate remainder of undesignated wetlands for Restoration. City Council Decision: Designate undesignated wetlands for Development. Notes: Site is important link in A-3 Channel habitat corridor, and while it could provide an important site for stonnwater treatment, the groundwater contamination makes acquisition difficult, and may jeopardize potential for wetland restoration and storm water treatment. Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) Page 63