Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site DR <br />Amendment #36 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Light medium industrial. <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. Rare plants unlikely due to lack <br /> of suitable habitat. <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No None of site is within flood hazard area <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No Nearest protected waterway, A-3 Channel, is over 1900 <br /> feet away. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection Yes Site DH, together with sites DB, DC and DD comprise a <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives large block of habitat and potential habitat at the northern <br /> end of the plan area <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br />1. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland No Adjacent to Sites DD and DC. <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 10" sanitary at north property line, 12" water line in <br /> Roosevelt Boulevard. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development No Primarily undeveloped land to south and west. <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Site abuts Roosevelt Blvd. (minor arterial) and Bertelsen <br /> Road (minor arterial) <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities Yes Existing on-site disturbance. <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD ' <br />1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Contains hydric Soils Yes A wbrig silty clay loam <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 2.3 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: Wetland area is in old field where past attempts to drain <br />have been made, wetland are low quality, urban level <br />services available. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 66 <br />