Ordinance No. 20200 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland Designation Criteria Site DD Amendment #35 PROTECTION STANDARD I. NR Metro Plan Designation COMMENTS Light medium industrial. PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS I. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not systematically surveyed. Rare plants unlikely due to lack of suitable habitat. - 2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No None of the site is within the flood hazard area 3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No At its nearest point, A-3 Channel is over 400 feet away. 4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No Nearest protected wetland is Danebo Pond, and there is no surface water connection. 5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No 6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection Yes Site DO, together with sites DB, DC and DH comprise a would further WEwp goals/objectives large block of habitat and potential habitat at the northern end of the plan area 7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No DEVELOPMENT STANDARD I. Approved Wetland Impact Permit COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS 1. Isolated, disconnected wetland No Sites DC and DH are adjacent to south and east. 2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 10" sanitary at north property line, 12" water in Roosevelt Boulevard. 3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development No Primarily undeveloped land to west and south. 4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Site abuts Beltline Road (major arterial) and Roosevelt Boulevard (minor arterial). 5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives 6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities Yes Wetlands impacted by on-site disturbance. RESTORA TION STANDARD 1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site COMMENTS RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS I. Contains hydric Soils Yes A wbrig silty clay loam 2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No Previously used for industrial use. 3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes 4. Lacks urban services No 5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No Total Wetland Acreage: 5.8 Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. City Council Decision: Same. Notes: Wetland area is in old field where past attempts to drain have been made, wetlands are low quality, urban level services available. Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) Page 65