My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 5183
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2017 No. 5180-5214
>
Resolution No. 5183
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2017 1:51:25 PM
Creation date
1/27/2017 1:51:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
1/25/2017
Document_Number
5183
CMO_Effective_Date
1/25/2017
Author
CRO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit C <br /> <br />Planning Director’s Findings and Recommendation: <br />Annexation Request for Furtick, Don <br />(City File A 16-10) <br />Application Submitted: October 13, 2016 <br />Applicant: Don Furtick <br />Location: East 30 th Avenue and Spring Boulevard <br />Subject Property: Tax Lot 500 of Assessor’s Map 18-03-09-20 <br />Zoning:AG/UL with Agricultural Zone and Urbanizable Lands Overlay <br />Representative: Renee Clough, Branch Engineering, 310 5 Street, Springfield, OR 97477; 541-746-0637 <br />th <br />Lead City Staff: Nicholas Gioello, City of Eugene Planning Division, 541-682-5453 <br /> <br />EVALULATION: <br />Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies <br />with Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation – Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and <br />approval in accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through <br />9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and <br />conclusions following each. <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the City’s urban growth boundary and is: <br /> (a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br /> (b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body of water. <br />Complies <br />Findings: The annexation area is within the City’s urban growth boundary (UGB), and is <br /> NO <br />contiguous to the City limits, consistent with subsection (a). <br />YES <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />any applicable refinement plans. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by <br /> NO <br />encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service <br />YES <br />provisions within the UGB, including the following policies from the Growth <br />Management section (in italic text): <br /> <br />Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city when it is found that: <br />a.A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to <br />the area in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />b.There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban <br />services and facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also <br />be consistent with the Metro Plan (page II-C-4). <br />Furtick, Don (A 16-10) January 2017 Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.